>>22014777 The point of McKee bakery products was to be a low cost weekly, monthly or even yearly sweet indulgence during the great depression. Are they good for that? Yes. Are they good at causing obesity in the EBT Americans that eat boxes at a time? Also yes. Are they the pinnacle of confectionery snacks? No.
>>22014777 They're good for a bite. Then you wrap the excess celophane over the bitten end and save the other bite for tomorrow, and maybe a 3rd or 4th bite for the following days unless it goes dry a box might last me til the "best by" date
>>22014780 ive wondered about this as well, i dont even like zebra cakes, fudge rounds, or hostess cakes anymore if i was given a tray of those as a teenager i would devour the whole thing in one sitting now i struggle to eat one
>>22014777 It used to be really good, but the changed the recipe over the past 15 years as well as reducing the filling. Particularly bad from the boxes sold in stores. I used to love them. On top of the higher quality, they used to be 25¢. The world have gotten worse.
They have this weird overly tart borderline bile/vomit taste and I’m not even one of those I hate sweets I hate junk food fags. Just one as a one-off is fine but more than one at once tastes gross for whatever reason
