>who??? If you aren't aware, Fallenshadow is the most hard-working schizo loli on the internet and enjoys the company of her husbands very much!! Please treat her well.
I have always been critical of these bouts of time where we do not even get a little update or a hello. There was always some semblance of reasonable cope that could justify it. Despite that; we are at a point now where her fans can buy her family an entire home and that is still not enough to motivate those small acknowledgements. I am convinced her fanbase is comprised of masochistic cucks and are completely primed for more secret and timely reveals. You think Rushia was bad? You haven't seen anything yet.
>>111797857 I love her more (this is so because I happen to also be the one who loves her the most, and as a superlative, it implies that I love her more than anyone else)
>>111812348 > “There is only one way to follow: humility!” > “The words of the Saints are the words of God and not of men.” You can't have it both ways, blasphemous fuckers.
>>111813802 Your brain is roasted. You cannot even do the most basic logic. If he is a saint (and aware of it: people regarded him as saintly and extraordinarily holy), and he says that saints speak for God, then he's saying that he's speaking for God.
>>111814038 People can't call themselves saints, if they do it's prelest; other people can see their holiness and love them for it while they're alive, and then venerate them after their repose, but it's up to the church to glorify them to sainthood and make them a saint in the eyes of the church He couldn't have known he'd be called a saint when he said that, he just elevated other saints in humility by encouraging obedience
>>111814133 > People can't call themselves saints, if they do it's prelest What matters most is what you do, not what you say. He acted in ways which led others to believe he was a saint. > people can see their holiness and love them for it while they're alive Which is idolatry, a violation of the most important of God's commandments. > it's up to the church to glorify them to sainthood and make them a saint in the eyes of the church Which makes the entire church heretical. > He couldn't have known he'd be called a saint when he said that He gathered crowds of people who venerated him, and spoke to them authoritatively. He knew what he was doing. > he just elevated other saints in humility by encouraging obedience Which is idolatry, prideful idolatry at that.
>>111814942 The early church was constantly persecuted, that's why there wasn't any official recognizion of saints There was veneration of the apostles (beyond the 12) and of the very first martyrs as early as the first two centuries, and icons have been around for just as long (when it was possible for them to be produced), tradition framing St. Luke the evangelist as the first icon painter
>>111815136 > The early church was constantly persecuted. It was Christians, not the early church, who were persecuted. In fact, the early church was an institution invented to subjugate Christians, founded by the most prominent persecutors themselves. > that's why there wasn't any official recognizion of saints No, the concept of 'saints' did not exist because it would have been too blatant a violation of Jesus' teachings. It took centuries of the church becoming more and paganised over time for them to finally adopt the concept. > There was veneration of the apostles (beyond the 12) and of the very first martyrs as early as the first two centuries Two centuries is a long time. Long enough to thoroughly corrupt Jesus' teachings for the benefit of the church. > St. Luke the evangelist as the first icon painter That reinterpretation of history didn't arise until the 6th century. The early church explicitly forbids icons.
>>111818601 I hope so, iirc she last streamed it on discord, and I'm banned so i couldn't watch It was kind of sad to watch it on my own, just commentating in the thread Unless this never happened and I've genuinely lost it
things get so much worse everytime she meets a barbie, im convinced they are doing the woman thing where they get together in private to gaslight eachother into thinking they can never ever do anything wrong and everything is your fault and they should just do whatever they want and if you dont like it you are le hecking toxic and manipulative or something
>>111832948 trying to date the horde of unappealing and autistic manchildren also ruined things. once she labeled her streams as a daycare it was beyond over. if a woman starts to view you that way there is no recovery and she views (you) that way.
>>111837930 >trying to date the horde of unappealing and autistic manchildren also ruined things That was the premise that made her ideal, though? All of the later issues stemmed from moving away from this premise
>>111839330 Untrue, but the way things are now just means she has more freedom and less responsibilities towards us, which she might think is more ideal, but that's untrue
>>111839952 >All of the later issues explain all of these new issues that aren't just something you're personally upset about and examples of how you've seen her suffer more from it in ways she didn't before. i already know you have no real answer that won't just be more cope at best so you don't need to bother if you don't want to, i won't care what you'd have to say to the contrary of that cause i know what you are whether you do yourself or not, with your emotional investment and focus on this in particular being the biggest evidence
>>111840078 Why is your criteria of judgment of something being more or less ideal whether she suffers more or not? I do not accept your premises because they're unjustified
