>>62333630
Yes it's completely ogre. Just sell and don't look back

As a get rich quick scheme? Yes
As a technology that works and will eventually appreciate in value? No

>>62333630
Literally a $62k stablecoin, nice

>>62333630
There's still gains to be made in BTC if you time the bottom in Q4 this year, but the picobottom-picotop will probably only be a 5x at best. This last run was fucking pathetic and the returns keep diminishing.

>>62333714
Meanwhile interest in alts is dead.

File: 1740758374157282.jpg (284.6 KB)

Unit of account, money-as-tally-board, is the primary function of money. It is this function that enables economic calculation, it is this function that enforces the game theory of voluntary exchange which frees us from the hobbesian war of all-against-all.

We now have an immortal, incorruptible, trustless, stateless, transparent tally board to ensure all the big, important tallies add up. If the current tally board is fair, then BTC should have a value of zero, if the current tally board is corrupt, BTC will approach Sole Denominator in-the-limit. Is the current tally board fair? Which path are we on?

>>62333630
Bitcoin price:

December 2017: $17,000

December 2022: $17,000

Durrdurr and I’m not even a mumu

>>62333630
considering inflation it is worth less now

>>62333630
Sure is.

>https://bitcoindeaths.com/

File: hmm.gif (1.5 MB)

>>62334399
>Bitcoin has been declared dead 472 times.
>If you invested $100 each time, you'd have $65,828,112 today.
Is that considered good?