/e/ Thread #3006085

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)07:52:33 No. 3006085

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)07:52:33 No. 3006085 [Reply] ►

File: muzan.jpg (634.3 KB)

Kimetsu no Yaiba

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)07:53:09 No. 3006086

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)07:53:09 No. 3006086 ►

File: soft bfly.png (3.1 MB)

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)07:55:08 No. 3006088

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)07:55:08 No. 3006088 ►

File: svb.png (3.0 MB)

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)07:55:56 No. 3006089

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)07:55:56 No. 3006089 ►

File: kny ov.png (2.4 MB)

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)07:58:11 No. 3006090

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)07:58:11 No. 3006090 ►

File: btbb.png (1.6 MB)

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)07:58:51 No. 3006091

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)07:58:51 No. 3006091 ►

File: demon.png (2.4 MB)

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)08:02:03 No. 3006095

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)08:02:03 No. 3006095 ►

>slop thread

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)08:06:42 No. 3006102

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)08:06:42 No. 3006102 ►

File: best bfly.png (2.3 MB)

>>3006095
Don't deny that they're good. Especially these:
>>3006088
>>3006086

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)08:09:35 No. 3006107

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)08:09:35 No. 3006107 ►

>>3006102
they're not good, they look generic and boring, not the worst slop but still slop

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)08:13:15 No. 3006111

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)08:13:15 No. 3006111 ►

>>3006107
>generic
Show me some art like it.

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)08:13:52 No. 3006112

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)08:13:52 No. 3006112 ►

>>3006111
literally all AI slop looks like that

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)08:19:10 No. 3006115

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)08:19:10 No. 3006115 ►

>>3006111
If you can tell from the thumbnail that it's slop... then yeah, that attribute is justified.

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)08:29:20 No. 3006119

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)08:29:20 No. 3006119 ►

>>3006112
Retard.

>>3006115
So you have zero examples?

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)12:25:24 No. 3006148

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)12:25:24 No. 3006148 ►

File: 1758960402170300.jpg (19.5 KB)

>>3006102
Eh, my biggest issue with AI at the moment is that the more I start looking for mistakes, the more I start noticing them.
For example, in these pictures, I'd say the breasts are fine, the lips and eyes look nice and they have cute hairstyles, but even in simple images like this where there isn't much to mess up, there's a bunch of errors with shadowing and things like hair strands being out of place. Like, what am I even looking at in picrel?
And these are just simple upper body pictures. The more complicated an image gets, the more likely it is for there to be a number of mistakes.
I could look past the generic "anime style" colouring scheme that AI has if it wasn't so riddled with mistakes. I'm sure there are examples of AI not fucking up pictures, but they're so few and far between that it makes the whole endeavour not worth it currently IMO. (And yes, actual artists can also fuck up too, but if someone were making the same number of mistakes that AI makes, I'd steer clear of their art as well.)

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)17:21:15 No. 3006213

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)17:21:15 No. 3006213 ►

>>3006148
>Eh, my biggest issue with AI at the moment is that the more I start looking for mistakes, the more I start noticing them.
I don't actively search for mistakes. If I notice it then I notice it, if I don't then I don't. If it's not obvious, then it's not a big deal for me.

>Like, what am I even looking at in picrel?
Looks like a gap in her hair. If you're going to nitpick my images, then the one in the OP is worse.(just look at the hands) I posted it because I find opposite gender reimagining to be fun, though.

>I'd say the breasts are fine
That's the best part of the images, that's why I posted them.

>>

Anonymous
09/27/25(Sat)18:21:47 No. 3006231

Anonymous 09/27/25(Sat)18:21:47 No. 3006231 ►

File: __kanroji_mitsuri_kimetsu_no_yaiba_drawn_by_ge_xi__962e8202c034fa7b4f4edadf86e39a97.jpg (1.7 MB)