I have and have worn both.
If you're used to boxers, that's what is going to feel comfortable to you. I mainly wear briefs (wearing a pair right now) and I like being held together. I will say I started wearing briefs again after years of wearing boxers and it did take some getting used to it, and it did feel restrictive at first. It's not restrictive, though. It's in your head and simply just doesn't feel right.

>>18679952
i've been 100% commando since like 2017 or so, feels good man

>>18679960
Me again. I also want to add that Hanes is garbage and you should respect yourself more than that.

>>18679963
>Hanes is garbage
I'm sure it is. But frankly when it comes to underwear I don't need or want anything fancy or expensive. Like I said, I've been wearing their cotton boxers for 20 years and everything has been fine. But your point about what you're used to is likely accurate. Although I've always been very sensitive to my crotch feeling restricted in any way, so it was probably stupid to even think boxer briefs would work.

>>18679952
I don't like the feeling of my junk sticking to my legs.

>>18679952
I use boxers with shirt fabric

Boxers are more comfortable but boxer briefs look better.

>>18680056
i agree they look better. but what point is there to clothing especially underwear looking better if its uncomfortable? it looks better under my pants, but im having to hide and grab my crotch all day long becuase of how uncomfortable it is?

>>18679952
Boxers from my experience are the worst because my dick and balls keep constantly falling out of the vertical slit. That's never happened with boxer briefs or briefs or anything else.

>>18679952
Because most men under 60 are still tight enough to not have all their shit sagging wrinkly down to their knees

Not you apparently

>>18679952
boxers give me wedgies too often

>>18679952
i wear boxer briefs because they keep my package secure under my thermal long johns.

They feel good to me. I always wear briefs. Comfy snug hug for my dick and balls. My junk is long and dangly, so going commando has things swinging and flopping all over the place.

>>18680035
>>18680101
>>18680323
>>18683196
Simply this. End of the retarded thread. OP rekt.

File: fasdfs.png (242.5 KB)

242.5 KB PNG

>>18679952
>there are men wearing the panties in the top row

>>18679952
It can be pretty fun to wear women's underwear from time to time. Granded, there's no space for your dick and balls, but it feels forbidden and naughty

File: s-l1200 (1).jpg (49.1 KB)

49.1 KB JPG

>>18683487
They are superior to the others, which just ride up on you anyway.

>>18683556
probably because you wear leggings

File: ab1da3316130b7667dfa9cc3b9f250a6.jpg (96.4 KB)

96.4 KB JPG

>>18683558
No, I'm just active.

>>18683560
active riding dick

>>18680056
Not if youre fat tho

File: IMG_9164.jpg (37 KB)

37 KB JPG

>>18683487
Absolutely. Briefs and thongs are the best.

On a semi-related note, how does /fa/ feel about underwear flies? I personally have never been able to get the vertical style to work practically, but the few pairs I have with the horizontal style work a treat-plus they have a more symmetrical look to them.

>>18679952
Boxer briefs don't have the tightness retaining them located in the crotch area, retard. The elastic band at the waist and elastic material around the thighs is what keeps them in place. What the fuck would tightness at the balls and dick accomplish? Try using your brain sometimes, as hard as it may be for you.

>>18683616
wtf then stop be fat anon

File: A1uTA63U3GL._AC_UY1000_-89816372.jpg (290.6 KB)

290.6 KB JPG

>>18680056
Boxers are not fucking more comfortable. How the fuck do you people even wear them? They always ride up and the sharp crotch seam digs into my balls and tries to twist them.

>>18685263
Those are for wearing inside the house, right? I don't think that would be comfortable to wear with jeans because they are too long. Underwear has to be more slim.

>>18685263
>>18685289
Yes they are sexy manly underwear for inside the fucking house. No one actually wears them under pants. That would be extremely retarded.

Aesthetically speaking:
briefs > thongs > boxers > boxer briefs > trunks