>>18683298
Retardation like this should be an instant ban.

File: 1763034847782588.png (85.4 KB)

85.4 KB PNG

>>18683301
>booooo there cannot be any discussion on my imageboard!!!

File: Screenshot_20260412-081808.png (1.3 MB)

1.3 MB PNG

>>18683298
Stop trying to be white, Rajesh Poplobang

File: 1746611258352675.jpg (33.6 KB)

33.6 KB JPG

>>18683312
Good job

File: Which is the most brutal‼️.jpg (144.6 KB)

144.6 KB JPG

>>18683314
>shilling old money, preppy, watches, post "recommend me a white mens fragrance" threads, handmade boots
No, seriously, the white cock sucking from south asians is hilarious

>>18683315
What the fuck are you talking about?
Also, the white "chad" is wearing a wig, retard

>>18683314
>motherfucking retarded post/question #938828
No, it’s you. Kys, for real.

>>18683317
I think you need to touch grass

>>18683298
Why do you want to look like a tube?

>>18683323
I mean, if that's the problem then why not get rid of the button?
or if you want to keep it for the looks or to have it as a replacement if the other one falls off, why not get rid of the corresponding hole so it can't be buttoned?

>>18683298
Some jackets aren't vented (or not well enough necessarily) so having it a bit open helps you not look like a stiff piece of furniture with arms and a head sticking out when walking.

Also having to undo one button instead of two makes it easier to open it fully to sit down as you're supposed to do instead of fiddle with 2+ which looks less elegant.

But yeah I mean I generally never wear it like that myself. I just see why people might.

>>18683855
symmetry

>>18683860
>Also having to undo one button instead of two makes it easier to open it fully
So men who wear suits are lazy pieces of shit in addition to being cucks for fatties.

>>18683298
You seem to have triggered the fashiontard rule cucks lmao. Bet they're the same people who parrot the "can't wear black and blue together" rule. Bunch of morons

>>18683893
fuck off you dumb samefag jeet

>>18683316
It's pretty easy to understand what he said. There is a lot of retardation about trying to be white for some reason, when if you were white to begin with, none of that would be necessary. It's literally just non-whites trying to be white racists as if that is something that could be accomplished through consumption. Sorry, but the only way to look "like a white man" is to be a white man. There is no substitution. You will never be white.

Why not make the jackets with just 1 button then?

>>18683301
op is right though

>>18684056
kys saar

File: 1773815211017531.png (1020.7 KB)

1020.7 KB PNG

>>18684038
Nobody wants to look like a "white man", retard. Suits haven't been white people clothes for over a century. Not to mention, modern suits were popularized by Jewish bankers anyway. Most modern western clothes are globohomo clothes, not "white man" clothes. People from every race have been wearing them for over a century now. In fact, more non-whites wear suits now than white people. Nobody thinks of jeans, t-shirts, polo shirts (which btw are Indian, not white), or suits and thinks they're "white" clothes. They're just regular modern globohomo clothes that evolved from adopting elements from every culture in the world. Actual white people clothes are traditional European outfits you see in civil war reenactment and renaissance fairs.

>>18684118
>Nobody wants to look like a "white man",
Blatant lies.
>[poltarded rant]
lmao
Angry happa is angry.

>>18684118
holy cope

>>18684118
Ok fucking faggot go out in your pointy boots and court jester tunic and walk around outside thinking you're cool. So fucking insecure Jesus fucking Christ.

>>18683994
U sound mad for some reason

File: catalogno12400sear_0288.jpg (227.4 KB)

227.4 KB JPG

>>18683298
the fat king story is apocryphal, originally only applied to vests, and no one can agree on which king it even was.

to the best of my research, this "rule" started among the upper class in england around 1900, but only with vests. in this early period, this phenom is not seen outside the uk, and only in photos of fops/dandies/other posh types.

going by clothing catalogs, the trend crossed the pond to america around 1940 but got mixed-up in translation, because it was applied to jackets instead (though for a while it was both jackets and vests) and from there it spread.

before this, fully buttoning one's jacket was common, there were no "rules" on which buttons to fasten, and sometimes people are seen doing the bottom one only (1912 catalog pic related). watch any movie set in the 1930s or earlier, made when those decades were still in living memory (the sting, sound of music, etc) and you will see people with fully buttoned jackets.

if you told someone back then, when the suit was a functional everyday garment, that there were buttons that "must never be buttoned" they would've found it laughable.

it's a bullshit rule based on lies that only persists because "it's a rule". return to tradition, and leave fastened or unfastened whatever button you want.