>>18717093
Not really a fan of logos. Do they have any without them?

>>18717100
Nope. Logo tells something about you. It's aspirational. It's something to have.

>>18717136
Just watched the video that dropped yesterday, right?

I think no logo looks great. But I also like the Lacoste logo personally because of my parents having many of them when I was growing up, passing some down etc.

>>18717142
Which video are you talking about?
I bought a fake polo for 3 dollars That's why I made this post.

>>18717136
>Logo tells something about you.
Logos tell that you look for external validation instead of inner worth.

It’s budget department store garbage.

>>18717136
yeah, the logo tells the whole world you're a retard

>>18717185
Being anti-logo is such a poor guy game.

Jeet spam thread.

Is this just a poor man’s Ralph Lauren?

>>18717235
Yes.
>>18717204
Thanks.

>>18717093
I didn't like them for a long time cause I thought they were a knockoff Polo Ralph Lauren. A lot of their clothes have obnoxious branding like picrel, but they also have clothes with just a small logo. I don't mind those. Their 100% cotton interlock and pique polos seem pretty good for under $20 at Walmart. On clearance their clothes go for like $5 to $10.

Walmart is the only place I can find size XS for their clothes.

Quality is mixed. I bought a pocket tee that got a small hole in it after a few wears/washes. I got a fleece lined vest that I ended up giving away from them because the pockets used some kind of net material. I would have preferred something solid. I also got a fleece quarter zip that's warm, comfortable, and looks nice.

Their website is buggy af. Customer service isn't helpful. I think they're owned by some Israeli holding company.