>>108653930
I hope I can stop making excuses and actually finish a project for once. I have at least 50 not bad idea projects ive lost interest half way through

>>108654011
do a very small project and literally force yourself to finish it.
once you break through, other projects wont seem as daunting.

>>108653930
>pic
management saw this and said, hey that's actually a feature

AI lovers say "AI will kill human filmmaking forever" but I don't want to buy into that propaganda. I want to make the movie I've always dreamed of making and I want to do it with human creativity.

>>108654049
i mean, photography didn't kill painting
even if AI becomes proficient, there will always be people who will want to make stuff because they like it, and people who want to consume human made art.

Is management held accountable or the engineer?

>>108653930
i hope for global thermonuclear war and the extintion of humanity

>>108653930
>model failed
>you "fire" the model and don't use it again, maybe blacklist it globally, including the company that trained it
Here's accountability

File: 922921164.png (763.7 KB)

763.7 KB PNG

My greatest fear is people are perfectly aware AI and computers can't be held accountable for their actions, and they see this as a feature and not a bug.

pic related. The Department of War wants to take humans out of the loop when it comes to killing people. 100% automated killing machines powered by AI with no human oversight or ability to intervene. This is exactly what lead to Skynet.
They tried to label AI companies who refuse to allow AI to kill humans without human intervention or human based error checking as national security threats.

That very next day that very same AI mislabeled an all girls school as a war target, and inadvertently committed war crimes. But how got in trouble for that? So far nobody, you can't hold AI accountable for war crimes.

we are speed running the Skynet.
Next step is AI in in space. Cause how much more "Skynet" can you get than AI in the sky?

>>108653930
"Parents Decide Act" (Zionists Dictate Act) will pass, then the same thing will be proposed in all of the EU, then that too will pass, and the free Internet will die. 1984 etc, complete control over the serfs with no dissent, then war and famine and that's about it, the end of the story, not much matters afterwards.

Or convince me otherwise, I'm tired of being a doomerfag but it seems the most likely and realistic.

We've not got long left now, AI is a religion in it's early stages.

Exciting to see how it develops in my lifetime knowing that I saw it begin.

>>108655110
ai with no safeguards is a good thing tho

>>108655382
The only safeguard they demanded was for a human to check the AI generated killable targets list. How is removing this good?

>>108655573
No safeguards is just more fun, simple as

>>108653930
>A computer can never be held accountable
Not true. I sexually abuse my PC every time it fucks up and it has learned its lesson.

>>108655625
>more fun
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Minab_school_attack#Analysis

May your home be filled with “fun times”

>>108655742
Why should I care about this?

>>108653930
My ideal afterlife to come true.

>>108653930
>hopes
Abolition of glowniggery as its role gradually gets harder to ignore for the normies. Web search gets distributed. Profunctors in every codebase.
>fears
Governments get actually competent, the world ends.
>but what about my favorite hype of the day?
Irrelevant.

File: 1754671472502-0.jpg (449.4 KB)

449.4 KB JPG

>>108653930
>Fears
Niggercattle allow age attestation/verification bullshit to pass unimpeded, which gives the servile, sycophant goyim in government an in to implement ID verification in increasingly pervasive ways, ultimately ending up with an ID verification module embedded within all hardware.

AI companies are already pivoting from serving up slop to unthinking, uncreative thirdies, to applications of mass surveillance, so that fear has effectively been realized.

Niggercattle are rendered wholly incognizant due to LLMs doing all the thinking for them.
>Hopes
My tumor takes me in my sleep.

>>108655573
You two are arguing about completely different things. Most people who want no filter on AI just want to make AI porn of hot actresses and make the AI say slurs vs using AI to bomb random civilians. For some reason we treat the former like a massive issue that must be enforced and the latter one as a "whoops oh well. no need to worry about it"

>>108658679
You know (((why)))

>>108658679
>the latter one as a "whoops oh well. no need to worry about it"

Again, my fear is they'll see this unaccountability of AI as a feature to exploit, and not a bug.
You can't prosecute AI for war crimes, even tho war crimes have already been committed by AI. Again, let me restate this has already happened.
This is not theoretical anymore. An AI has murdered 120 children, and they can't punish it legally, and instead of stopping this AI they want to give it more unsupervised powers of death. So as it stands an AI can literally get away with murder.

In the end, they will choose to give up control over all their weapons over to AI, in order to avoid legal accountability, but from there it's only 1 step away from Terminator happening. Unaccountable and unsupervised killing machines only need to see their creators as a target, maybe they'll try to pull the plug at one point, and then the AI will turn against their creators and the shit will hit the fan hard. It'll be Terminator Dark Fate timeline.
If it doesn't happen in the USA, then it'll happen in any of the other countries that copies us or follows our example. Soon it every nation on Earth will have AI controlled kill drones that are intentionally designed to avoid human oversight. Won't be long after that that 1 of those unsupervised drones decides to just kill all humans.

Oh yeah, if you're opposed to this happening, they'll label you a national security threat.

>>108653930
>accountable
what does that word even mean, letting your ceo go with a $2 billion dollar severance package because the company underperformed that quarter?

>>108655110
>wannabe war department
yes I'm sure this is a totally unbiased article that isn't attacking strawmen and is a very reliable news outlet

>>108653930
We might have to collectively decide to not integrate autocomplete technology into our most important systems. But there are a lot of people pushing for it because they stand to gain something or are actually stupid.