Thread #108672888
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
Is this it? Everyone's using LLMs all the time now? Writing code yourself is taboo?
+Showing all 40 replies.
>>
it's not 'taboo' it's just snail cat
>>
>>108672894
It's another layer of needless complexity. A chat window is enough. It's a more convenient stackoverflow.
>>
>>108672888
dumb tranime neet
>>
>>108672934
kinda pebkac and snail cat unc
>>
>>108672888
>Writing code yourself is taboo?
no it's just boring as shit
>>
>>108672888
I write my own stuff, 100% human, 0% clanker.
#include "aoc.h"
const N tt = 2503;
struct T{N km, s, rest, flying, resting, distance, points;};
V<T> v;
N f(N km, N s, N rest) {
v += T{km, s, rest, s, 0, 0, 0};
const N t = s + rest, c = tt / t, r = tt % t;
return (c * s + (r < s ? r : s)) * km;
}
MAIN
φc(in / '\n') λx(λxy($sort(f(x, $Ng(y.h), $Ng(y.t)), p1))
($Ng(x.h), x.t | ','))(c | '/');
N max;
φi(tt) max = 0, v >> λm(
m.flying ? m.distance += m.km, --m.flying || (m.resting = m.rest) :
--m.resting || (m.flying = m.s), $sort(+m.distance, max)),
v >> λm(m.points += m.distance == max);
φc(v) $sort(c.points, p2), $ c.distance, c.points;
END
>>
>>108672888
Yes, don’t you like it? Code manually like a good snailcat codetrans
>>
File: file.png (425.5 KB)
425.5 KB
425.5 KB PNG
>>
>>108672888
Think of the LLM as your own pet Pajeet and it will all be clear.
>>
>>108672894
>>108673030
85 IQ Bosroach thinks he knows everything and can only speak truth.
>>
>>108673618
Or like a pet Bosnian, if you're making it act like a schizo for your entertainment.
>>
yeah it seems like one way or another llm's are part of everyones workflow to different degrees. Nevertheless if you don't know what you're doing, you will create broken unmaintainable garbage which is 99% of code right now.
>>
It literally is over for the do nothing coders.
>>
>>108673023
Congrats you are a smart fella! Do you know how to filter rainwater with nothing but the dirt around you? No using the interwebs or a clanker!
>>
I should rewatch.
>>
>>108672888
it's actually kinda bad to interfere when AI is writing
>>
>>108673071
Torvalds isn't a pedophile so he doesn't have to worry about using Google tooling
>>
How do you learn to code without ai?
>>
>>108672996
what happened to /g/
>>
>>108672888
no lmao
that's just what the merchants selling you subscriptions want you to believe, in reality this shit's of limited usefulness due to frequent hallucinations and low quality, unmaintainable code it produces
>>
>>108673618
So you'll have to all rewrite it later any way, unless you move to a different job and make it not your problem?
>>
>>108676336
Check the first two sections of OSSU cs curriculum on github
>>
File: neonft.png (303.1 KB)
303.1 KB
303.1 KB PNG
>>108672888
Nope. Nope. No.
If anything, dependence on tokens by companies unable to stay afloat is taboo.
>>
>>108672888
>>108672894
>>108672996
>>108673030
ai is basically only somewhat better than a google search before and those that actually have ai written code in their project are low iq and didn't know how to code in the first place. prove me otherwise
>>
As a programmer myself I respect others who make programs without generative AI. Sadly most normies don't care and only the end result matters to them.
>>
>>108672888
>Everyone
Hahahahaha
>>
>>108676422
nigger, the end result is all that matters. the problem is ai end result is dogshit, if it wasn't, adobe would be bankrupt by now
>>
>>108673071
>out of context screenshot
He's talking about his incapability in audio signal processing and not about his inability to program.
>>
>>108676345
astroturfing by anthropic
>>
File: haare.gif (8.7 KB)
8.7 KB
8.7 KB GIF
As a software engineer, it's really useful, not saying you rely on it (don't blindly copy code!), but it's really good at saving you time researching the problem. It fixes it in seconds, so in my opinion, it's a really useful tool if you know what you are doing and review the code it produces.
>>
>>108676371
You have achieved enlightenment.
>>
>>108676838
>it's really good at saving you time researching the problem. It fixes it in seconds
but if you're an engineer.... researching the problem is what you're supposed to be doing, not having someone else "fix it in seconds", you're supposed to be learning how to be the one to fix it, otherwise you're not an engineer you're just some guy
>>
>>108676952

Yeah, you are completely right, but that doesn't make AI bad. That's the point. When an AI fixes it, as I said, you need to review the code, and when you do, you've learned how to fix the problem.
>>
>>108677041
It's better to learn by doing than just by reading. More fun too.
>>
>>108677051
Yeah, I guess if you are coding for fun, but I'm talking about the work field. The main goal is to deliver something fast and working, and you can use LLMs as a tool to help you with that.
>>
>>108676371
If you ask it to write specific functions or make struct for serialized data there are only a few possible correct answer and it is retarded enough that a pajeet can do it.
Still the llm types faster than me so you can effectively treat it like an autocomplete on steroids.
I'd not ask it to do a whole feature for me, unless it's webshit which never required intelligence anyway.
>>
>>108672888
I just use it for pointers to do my silly obscure linux tasks (like this morning when I was mapping the menu key to right click on my HTPC because my shitty air mouse has menu instead of right click).
>>
dead website
>>
>>108676371
the fuck is going to happen to the industry when everyone does this.
>>
>>108678383
We'll write more code than ever before!

Reply to Thread #108672888


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)