lol kid
there is no free

File: Maybe.jpg (49.1 KB)

>>464285
You just gave a FREE (You) to the OP, "KID". Off you go.

>>464286
holy shit youre an idiot.
its getty images. they sell images. there is no free. its literally what they do.

>>464283
Just use AI

>>464293 I wish we could dislike 4chan posts

>>464289
Funny how those that are so quick to throw insults are often the most ignorant.

I've used free pictures from Getty lots of times in the past. Getty often grant unrestricted logins (any size downloads, no watermark) to advertising agencies and design companies* because they know said agency will pay for any pictures they use commercially. This practice allows those companies to quickly and easily use the images for pitches and mockups etc.

I haven't got that luxury at the moment because where I work at now doesn't use many stock images and I didn't want to go begging to ex-colleagues but it looks like I might have to.

*With due respect, I suggest that maybe you would know that, if you worked in the industry.

File: 4x-scale.jpg (4.8 MB)

>>464283
You can upscale images.
Guess I forget that graphic designers aren't used to staying up to date on technology, but if you're in this field, you ought to.
The fact that you can do this is fucking unreal. This was like a law of physics that you could scale down, but not up, since the advent of images on computers. But no longer.

>>464302
Thanks anon. I've used it a bit but not for a while, so yeah, it's bound to have improved.

I had a little play with the firefly feature in potatoshop. It didn't do too badly 2bh.

Unfortunately there was some type on the picture, which got turned into that giveaway AI slop type, which I solved with an overlaid a layer that I rezzed up the old way and unmasked the type onto it.

What I couldn't solve nicely was getting rid of the watermark (cleanly enough).

Oh well. I'll have to ask around for a login.

aren't the watermarks supereasy to edit out by design so that getty can sue for BIG BUCKS everytime a dumbass uses those images comercially?

>>464317
What's the technique?

>>464289
imgur is an option

>>464295
reddit mentality, you should try going there instead
>>464293
(you)'re still a faggot thoughbeit

>>464337
I only use mainchan

>>464283
Try unsplash or pexels.
unsplash is more no nonsense, pexels requires you to have an account.
just manage your expectations.

File: 1000059880.jpg (4.8 MB)

>>464339
All of the halftoned graphics are from unsplash with a halftone filter applied.
Unsplash are okay enough for amateur work (like picrel).

>>464283
>https://gettyimages-downloader.beatsnoop.com/

>>464283
She's so hot!

>>464340
numbers arent god dumb ass. leonardo was wrong and you are wrong.

>>464382
Doesn't work.

>>464305
Not sure which feature you're using, but it doesn't sound like proper upscaling. Use the upscaler in PS if you have access to it. You can upscale with local models as well, but if you're struggling on this, you're not ready for that.

Point is, upscaling will not garble up text. Sounds like whatever you're using is regenerating an image based on an image, not upscaling.
Upscaling is a process that scales up your exact image, and using AI smoothens out the lossy areas.

>>464305
>Same anon as >>464400
Notice in the upscaled (4x) image of yours that I posted. There's no damage done to the text on her shirt.