File: 360e0xymklk61.jpg (2.1 MB)

2.1 MB JPG

>>18430813
the level of superiority of slavic bolshevism is truly hard to comprehend, 3 reich was like an african village compared to USSR

>>18430825
All those factories were moved safely to the east with lend lease trucks and trains.
I think its the best example of teamwork in world history of people with very dissimilar beliefs deciding “no this is way worse, lets put aside our differences”. I wonder what soviet and American relations would have been like post war if FDR had lived to discuss the bomb with them. Less mistrust perhaps.

>>18430825
you mean the superiority of lend lease, Hitler was perhaps trying to hide the fact that the USSR's boy pussy had been lubed by western capitalist powers since anyone with a modicum of rationality could conclude the war on the eastern front was already lost based on this information alone

>>18430813
The best thing this shows is how deluded Hitler was and how bad german inteligence was.
The soviets never had 35k tanks

>>18430873
they built 80k t34s alone over the course of the war

>>18430867
>lend lease before barbarossa hooooly retard

>>18430910
soviets got a lot of machines from nazis in 1939-1941
nice one, hitler

>>18430910
>I would like to express my candid opinion about Stalin’s views on whether the Red Army and the Soviet Union could have coped with Nazi Germany and survived the war without aid from the United States and Britain. First, I would like to tell about some remarks Stalin made and repeated several times when we were "discussing freely" among ourselves. He stated bluntly that if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany's pressure, and we would have lost the war. No one ever discussed this subject officially, and I don't think Stalin left any written evidence of his opinion, but I will state here that several times in conversations with me he noted that these were the actual circumstances. He never made a special point of holding a conversation on the subject, but when we were engaged in some kind of relaxed conversation, going over international questions of the past and present, and when we would return to the subject of the path we had traveled during the war, that is what he said. When I listened to his remarks, I was fully in agreement with him, and today I am even more so
But logistics are probably to complex for your puny jeetbrain to handle
https://www.o5m6.de/redarmy/ll_routes.php

>>18430916
>thread about hitler reaction to how many tanks USSR had BEFORE the invasion
>b-but ll
retard

>>18430922
>Hehe, lend-lease was irrelevant
>NO, THIS THREAD IS ABOUT THE HECKING REACTIONARINO OF DITTLER
I accept your concession

>>18430928
>>NO, THIS THREAD IS ABOUT THE HECKING REACTIONARINO OF DITTLER
yeah? it is about it, look at the OP

>>18430941
>says retarded stuff not related to the topic
>NO, DON'T CORRECT ME! DERAILING!

>>18430890
In June 1942?
They never had 35k tanks at the same time. ONLY during the cold war

>>18431400
You’re a fucking retard, they had 12,000 T-26s alone

>>18431504
I have no idea how they count in your niggerville 3rd world Aids infected shithole. But here In the civilized world, 12 is a smaller number then 35
I Will even go a step further so your 60iq pea sized street shitter brain can grasp it. 12 is less then half of 35

>>18431400
One kv1 was worth 100 panzers so that makes sense

I can't find accurate figures for tank production, but 35k isn't far fetched.

Light tanks (varies): 14,508
T-34 (production began 1940): 35,119
T-34-85 (began 1943, ramped up 1944, largely supplanted the original): 29,430
KV and KV-85 (39-43): 4,581
IS (43-): 3,854
SU-76 (Dec 42-): 12,671
SU-85 (43-): 2,050
SU-100 (44-): 1,675
SU-122 (Dec 42-): 1,148
SU-152 (43-): 4,779

How many light tanks were available in 1942? Many were memetanks from the 1930s like the T-26, though some had been lost during Operation Barbarossa and some may have been produced later. Ballpark estimate between 5k and 10k.

How many T34s were available in 1942? Production I expect largely declined by the end of 1943 in favor of the T-34-85, so much of the 35k was built during 1943. 10k - 20k. Same with the KVs, 1k - 2k.

The estimate may also include self-propelled guns and other armored vehicles, they had around 1000 at the start of Operation Barbarossa.

lower end estimate: 16k
upper end estimate: 33k

Perhaps Hitler was overinflating the number of tanks to explain why his prediction "we only have to kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will come crumbling down". He was perhaps also trying to give the impression that the Soviet Union was a monstrous war machine that would come for Finland next if Germany lost the war, not a paper tiger that for example struggled to convert its ample crude oil into aviation fuel, half of which came via lend lease.

Test

>>18431817
why his prediction didn't pan out*

File: World-War-2-Deaths-by-Country-Pie-Chart-2[1].png (20.1 KB)

20.1 KB PNG

>>18430825
Apparently not, jeetskin.

>>18430873
Unfortunately, true. Germany's intel apparatus itself was heavily compromised with traitors and spies.

File: 58419833_2437964742936422_8876259742134042624_n.jpg (46.3 KB)

46.3 KB JPG

>>18430825
Slavic Bolshevism always wins over opression