No. Historians can't even agree on how widely documented major historical events in recent history went down.

>>18435115
You'll figure out that all stories are bullshit. Non-existent.

>>18435115
maybe if there's a stable wormhole that popped up before the earth was created and is still floating around out there, moving at relativistic speeds, and we manage to find it and send in a probe which, due to time dilation, would actually go into the past, then we would be able to record the entire history of the planet
or maybe with some insane configuration of gravitational lenses we could point a telescope back at earth in the past
I often daydream about a good enough simulation, taking all our archeological and geological data and extrapolating
lots of gaps, lots of "hallucinations", but we could probably get very close
we could just go there and run multiple simulations with different variables and different assumptions. we wouldn't "know", but we could make more informed guesses. I imagine a future where historians go on field trips in these simulations for years at a time
maybe we're in one of those simulations now
hello, historians!

>>18435254
>all of history is fake
why are atheists like this?