Maaaybe because communism openly denied nationalist tenets such as family and fatherland?

Because the junkers backing them didn't want their expansive Prussian estates land-reformed away

>>18514570
Gaydolf Shitler was a British spy

Hitler purged the socialist wing of the party, but come to regret it later on. Turns out the bourgeoisie have no use for nationalism and they only care about profits, thus the wealthy industrialists simply switched to supporting the Allies the moment it was convenient to do so. Hitler should have send the robber barons straight to labour camps along with zionists and stay allied to the USSR. The real enemies were the Anglo-American plutocracies after all.

File: soldier.png (674.4 KB)

>>18514667
This. It was the biggest mistake to reject the Soviets from joining the Axis. If Adolf was so set on the Lebensraum idea, he should have expanded westwards instead of East. What Germany needed was their own version of the Red Terror.

>>18514570
>why did a bunch of tradLARPs have a particular disdain for an ideology that called religion the opium of the masses?

>>18514679
The idea behind achieving Lebensraum in Europe was pretty bad. Colonisation is good if you do it in sparsely populated areas to speed up the whole process and to minimise local resistance. Similar to what Soviets did in the Kazakh steppe during their Virgin Lands campaign, the Americans in the Midwest or the British in Australia, Canada and South Africa. Eastern Europe was already densely populated, thus this whole plan was ultimately doomed from the start.

>>18514570
Because mussolini and hitler were sell out faggot peasants to the establishment and mussolini was a sell out faggot piece of shit peasant who sold out to corporations and to catholicism and to the churches or something like that

>>18514570
Uhh, because owning stuff is good and russians are retards?

>>18516273
If bolsheviks were retards, how come that slavic bolshevism still ultimately triumphed over germanic nazism?

>>18516344
Enormous amounts of assistance from America kept them in the war.

>>18514570
Neither Communists nor Nazis like to talk about it, but Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were "friends" for a while.

"On September 22, 1939, German and Soviet troops held a joint military parade in the occupied Polish town of Brest-Litovsk (today Brest, Belarus) to mark their coordinated invasion and division of Poland under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. The parade symbolized a brief and uneasy alliance between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union."

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WhygEmI_yaE

>>18514650
Rightly so, because communism is just about violently replacing aristocrats with power-hungry bureaucrats.
Same level of empathy, but the former at least have some experience running the place

>>18516352
Perhaps… but more I look at history, the more I’m convinced that Slavic Bolshevism is the ultimate ideology of power. I don’t like Slavs, I don’t like Bolshevism, but their power was undeniable and if I had no morals, only idolizing power itself, I would become a slavic bolshevik.

File: average mossad agent.png (1.7 MB)

>>18514646
Not exactly, the ideas of loving ones people and such does exist but it's more so based on class instead of just nationality/ethnicity. Right wing nationalism is a bourgeois ideology to foster elitism amongst the working class and split the global working class since they want you to believe that you are separate which you are not. Capital is global and is able to move freely across borders to extract value from elsewhere in the world whilst it's only the people who do not have that freedom and essentially have the same basic struggle no matter where they are, although the working class in the global north does generally benefit off of 3rd world exploitation as well but that's a question for another day. And nationalism isn't inherently right wing since it's based on the idea of national self-determination and has been a tool by third world countries to build socialism whilst fighting off colonial and imperialist forces. Castro, Ho chi minh, Allende, kim il-sung, Sankara and so on were all nationalists and they certainly loved their people and country. Nationalism in the short term can be good if it's rooted in national emancipation from foreign powers.

>>18514570
They didn't care about capitalism despite their lip service to critiques of capitalism. They immediately began to practice capitalism after getting into power. They just didn't like the America and Britain owned all the capital.