File: dark ages.png (1.2 MB)
If Christianity was a good thing for Europe, why was no aqueduct rebuilt? Theaters, bath houses, temples and shrines, almost all destroyed by Christian mobs, legislation, and lawlessness. Why is the literature childish compared to the Aeneid or ANY Greek play? How come textualists estimate that 99.9% of all literature was lost? Did anyone oppose the church laws calling for destruction of all things not Christian? There were several Iconoclasms where Christians were destroying art, literature, and churches of heretic Christians. Why is the art blocky and expressionless compared to Roman frescos? Why were the Olympics not restarted after Christians forced its end? Why didn’t the Academy or the Lyceum reopen even if under a Christian name? Why did Augustine become a theological champion for pushing that “curiosity of the natural world is a sin.”? Why massive population decline in every city after oppressive blasphemy laws and the routine burning of heretics? Every city had a sewer system in ancient Rome, none were maintained why? Of the roads surveyed in 1500, why were 95% of them built 1,000 years earlier? Why were the trades routes to the East severed regularly and easily so? Why almost zero jurisprudence such that the Justinian Code was still in use the 19th century? Yes, there was still culture. Not an enlightened one in any sense.
Christianity did not just corrupt the Mediterranean, it also corrupted the North. Viking and Celtic women had so many rights that were squandered by Christianity. Also bathing was practiced better by them before Christianity.
Showing all 33 replies.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>18515614
You have Christians to thank for preserving the classics we have now, actually.
You're so fucking retarded, you refuse to acknowledge that Christians did any good for the world because you're blinded with hatred for God because you love being a retarded homosexual.
>>
>>18515614
>Why massive population decline in every city after oppressive blasphemy laws and the routine burning of heretics?
I don't think that affected population growth. The decline in the european population was more due to plagues.
>>
>>18515759
The onset of Christianity is what stopped the preservation of pagan traditions in the first place. Some Christians preserving a couple texts relating to larger traditions isn’t a service to paganism, it’s more like putting a bandaid on a stab-wound that you inflicted. Imagine if I lit your house on fire and burned it to the ground, but went inside and grabbed your television and handed it to you before it got destroyed. Would you get on your knees and thank me? Obviously not.
Besides, pagans had already been copying and preserving these texts for centuries and would have continued to do so without Christianity. Christianity was absolutely not necessarily for the preservation of these texts.
Also you worship the shitstain demon Yahweh-Typhon, the actual most high is Zeus yet you slander him with labels like “false god,” “demon”, or “fallen angel”. Enjoy Tartarus for your impiety.
>>
>>18515759
Christkeks create the problem they claim to be an answer to lol. Yeah 99% of ancient literature was destroyed but at least we got some scraps reinterpreted by christkeks based on how good or bad it made them feel
>>
>>
>>18515614
>If Christianity was a good thing for Europe, why was no aqueduct rebuilt?
They were and new ones were constructed. This was often even driven by monks and monasteries for Pete's sake:
https://old.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/mnlf9n/when_the_romans _left_england_and_left_behind/gtyhs ly/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>18516834
From the passage of time. Scrolls deteriorate and storage space gets repurposed for more pressing matters. Compared to other religions, Christians (and to a lesser degree, Muslims) invested an exceptional amount of effort to save bits of history, often even ones they disagreed with, for the future generations.
>>
>>
>>18515759
>heh, monks saved most pagan literature don't ya know?
>just ignore the fact that early Christian mobs burned books and destroyed sculptures
>WTFF how could these mudslimes convert the hagia Sophia into a mosque? Remove kebab!
>umm sweaty, those pagan temples would've fallen to ruin if we didn't pillage them and convert them into churches ya know?
Christcuck logic be like
>>
>>
>>18516971
Except pagans had already been copying these texts for centuries and would have continued to do so without Christianity; it's foolish to suggest that Christianity was somehow necessary for their preservation (especially when pagan institutions that had already been preserving them for centuries like temple libraries and Neoplatonist academies were literally shut down by Christians). It’s less that Christianity “saved” the classics but rather they became the sole librarians after they helped dismantle the competition.
>>
>>18517200
>to suggest that Christianity was somehow necessary for their preservation
I think the suggestion is 'losing texts to time was the standard and Christians did the most to counter-act it'.
>pagans had already been copying these texts for centuries
They lost most of their texts. Plato is kind of an exception, but 80% Aristotle's work is lost to time and a decent part of that loss happened before Christ was even born, 3rd-1st century BC.
>Neoplatonist academies were literally shut down by Christians
And yet, despite opposing the institution to the point of the emperor himself shutting it down, neoplatonic texts were preserved by Christians so well that we are currently seeing a near-revival of the movement among cogsci enthusiasts. QED
>>
>>
>>
>>18517243
>Christians did the most to counter-act it'.
They didn't, they shut down pagan temples that had already done the job fine without them. The loss of classical texts lies solely on Christians since they actively refused to copy down texts they didn’t see as “useful,” even if pagans saw them as immensely valuable. The texts we do have only survived because they were essential for teaching Greek and Latin grammar or rhetoric (Virgil was the standard for Latin and you needed Aristotle to win debates), not because Christians appreciated the content itself which was pagan and thus considered by Christians to be “demonic superstition.”
>a decent part of that loss happened before Christ was even born, 3rd-1st century BC.
Other way around retard, the vast majority of texts were lost after paganism was outlawed in the 4th and 5th centuries AD. Explicitly anti-Christian works like Porphyry of Tyre’s 15-volume refutation of Christianity titled Against the Christians were intentionally destroyed because, well, they were explicitly anti-Christian.
>neoplatonic texts were preserved by Christians so well
Not well enough since the Chaldean Oracles aren’t preserved.
>>
>>18515626
Nietzsche's claims make no sense even treating the Bible as literature. The characterization of 'slave morality' is easily countered by the fact so many prominent Biblical figures were literal nobles and exemplified noble virtues.
It's best to take Nietzsche as using Christians to symbolize a particular kind of moral reasoning which he finds deplorable, but for which the actual symbol doesn't really matter beyond being recognizable.
Of course Nietzschefags are obsessed with interpreting his philosophy in the most juvenile and superficial way possible, thus ensuring they mine no genuine insight beyond the textual equivalent of a soijak meme.
>>
>>18517355
Your only example of something not being preserved is an explicitly anti-Christian work which you then extrapolate to mean anything not immediately useful for Christianity. This is a dishonest framing.
>>
>>18515614
The crisis at this point on the mediterranean on that island sea were partly that symbol image presentation representation demonstration descriptorily crisis at that point at time and that after time period comes the humanist christian semiotics and the christian field were important as images and patterns the meanings to symbols and readings to stories and reading that circulate through symbol systems but christian and the circulation of these ‘pattern dubs’ that circulate and are communicated through and to christian there were an image gets continually over inscribed over other image dequincey talks about this palimpsest and for christian all the symbols that have been and gotten and were and was freshly were flawed and cracked for one thing cause to what thomas browne that everything made by god had crack on there and also the images and symbols composed had already fallen away from forms and the logos as immationasts would claim so and but those are some of the christian logos symbol discourse semiotic compute compleat ideas and this could be argued were an improvement to symbol systems that christians were doing but that was what christians were doing anyway or something like that