>>18517445
No, Christians historically have no qualms with killing non-Christian or "heretical" children and babies.

>>18517445
Christians committed infanticide all the time until the 19th century. It wasn't legal and wasn't publicly celebrated, but it happened whenever it was convenient and went completely unpunished. The idea of normies strictly adhering to religious morality was basically invented by the Anglo-American middle class in the 1850s.

>>18517445
The topic of eugenics always baffled me, and sometime in my teen years I quickly learned to just bury my opinions because it's extremely politically loaded. People already practice eugenics in mate selection, and if you think castrating retards or other undesirables and selecting for an ideal mate are fundamentally different, I don't think you're worth talking to. I don't want white people practicing abortion except in extreme cases, but if black people want it, like they already do, go ahead, I won't intervene.

File: 1000006922.png (518.9 KB)

>>18517455
How can you be both pro-eugenics and pro-life? Any eugenics program is going to require reinstating Roe v. Wade by necessity.

File: Iqsex.jpg (190.1 KB)

>>18517455
>People already practice eugenics in mate selection,
[Citation needed]

File: Seneca.jpg (100.2 KB)

>>18517454
Yes but it was condemned socially and therefore kept under wraps. Meanwhile non-Christian societies just didn't give a shit. See also: China

Is op’s pic fake? If it isn’t I’m disappointed in asmongold. He’s basically saying that if you were born with down’s syndrome you don’t deserve to live. Fucking prick.

>>18517445
Sikhs have always expressly forbidden infanticide, including the killing of infant girls, which was common in that part of the world.