In America, 63% of Biden's appointed judges were female but only 19% of Trump's judges were female. 60% of Biden's judges were non-white but only 16% of Trump's judges were non-white
>>222157100 Y'all's chud stories are making me tempted to illegally immigrate to West Frankia to escape the toil of my daily 3rdie slave job. I mean no one is gonna punish you for it and you automatically become a legally protected class for being brown so why not?
>>222157191 >bring a sample of your kid's dna with you to another country >get a test done in secret >if it doesn't match, wait a year or so and sue to have a legal test done in France because you just have a "hunch" Seems like you could get around it
>>222157270 or you could just start liquidating these parasites one by one by taking matters in your own hands. This actually is a realistic possibility as muslim men are more than willing to help anyone eliminate feminists and gynocrats
>>222157057 >marxist hags Explains why brown-on-white criminals always get away with it. Pierre should guillotine this trash first thing in the morning.
Women judges here sometimes give extremely stern speeches that sound like theyll end up with death penalty only to award someone with a suspended sentence and anger management course
>>222159326 >procurator or whatever go on public tv and speak about 10 years of jail for the rioting following psg victory >hardly any sentence, at best a few months ofc it's only a surprise for goyims
>>222160627 I've read a fair amount of dissident eastern bloc writing and I consistently get the vibes that women were bigger cunts under that system. You hear pretty consistently that it's fine crossing paths with elite men, but their wives would destroy your life just for the fun of it.
Part of why feminism struggled to take hold in the east for so long is because of the economic experience of the 90s. Women could've proven themselves and been useful, but they just didn't.
>>222160627 If the women in my life have taught me anything it's that they are way more creatures of emotion than rationality. Wouldn't be surprised if >>222157100 is a common occurrence with female judges
>>222161863 In their most popular fiction you frequently see the hero woman completely fucking over the life of another woman/man through lies and deceit, and ruining that person's life through siccing authorities on them. Of course it's justified via plot contrivance, but it's eerily common and speaks to how they love to flex power.
>>222161767 It's not even about the emotionality, arguably they're more callous and stoic in these roles in a certain sense. They have an uncritical acceptance of arbitrariness and hierarchy and don't care when someone they regard lesser is churned out. It's why in literally every cult you see the charismatic big man immediately staff women in his lieutenant roles. Hypocrisy itself is the flex, the releasing a criminal who slaughters a family isn't because she's a bleeding heart, it's because she goes home that night thinking she's powerful for imposing that shit on people poorer than she is.
I've been in circles around such people with such jobs and heard them gossip about it, they laugh around the coffee table about people's lives being ruined.
>>222157057 Yes, in many countries being a judge, especially a lower level one, is essentially bureaucratic work that is neither high paying nor particularly prestigious. Hence, many women.
This is not a Western phenomenon, Latvia and Slovenia have around 80% female judges but so does le based Cuba. And Russia is also close to 70%.
This is another planned strategy to undermine and weaken our societies. In Spain, they already make up almost 60% (and more than 70% of new admissions to the Judicial School).
Our Supreme Court established that the criterion of preferential treatment for women, when merit is equal with men, operates as a guiding principle in the promotion of the Judiciary. I personally know of a law graduate who decided to abandon his aspirations to become a judge after losing his position to a woman.
>>222167923 >Always find it crazy that they dont have juries. I consider it a legal aberration. It's the liberal democratic principle applied to justice. A complete mess.
>>222169328 >Planned by whom? And which societies? International Jewry (yes, I know it sounds like a silly conspiracy theory). Only societies less contaminated by modernity (more "traditional") resist this phenomenon. In Anglo-Saxon countries, for example, the percentage is not yet so exaggerated due to the persistence of common law (which tightens access requirements).