>>222160546 >I'm going to interpret the Quran in bad faith to refute it >Noooo you can't do the same with the bible that's not what it meant the word had a different meaning back in the day plus it's bad translated plus you're missing the historical context plus it's not meant to be taken literally plus it's a metaphor anyways
>>222163124 No one here is Christian, I can quote stupid shit from the bible like how Jesus exorcised demons from some guy into pigs causing the pigs to drown themselves in a river. This is among the dumbest cherrypicking in the bible regarding Jesus (OT is dumber but Muslims believe that too), there is nothing even remotely comparable to a desert gangbang cuckoldry session with Mohammad's most cherished companion watching and recording.
>>222163371 >there is nothing even remotely comparable to a desert gangbang cuckoldry session with Mohammad's most cherished companion watching and recording. This never happened. It's not even a bad interpretation or a weak hadith, it's a straight up lie
>>222163124 There's really no other way to interpret the Hadith. The al zutts (real people, not djinns) RODE him all night long which resulted in Muhammad being exhausted and in pain from how they "ridden him". That's just gay.
>>222166767 >Zutt show up in desert >they're naked >they overpower Mohammad >Abdullah sits down in fear of them >no mention of jinn whatsoever >Mohammad's body ached after the ordeal And don't try to spin that 'angel' line at the end as literal, there's no shot in hell Islam thinks angels look like jeets.
>>222167008 The word in Arabic for ride can and often does have sexual connotations. So we're between believing that he was fucked by the Zutt or they literally mounted him and rode him around like a pony. Your call.