>>65061473
It's really not idk what you're smoking but F22 >F35 every day

>>65061473
>how aesthetically pleasing?
It's a box. If that gets you off, who am I to kink-shame a weirdo?

>>65061479
(Not OP) I like em both. Maybe a slight edge to the F-22, but both are very nice jets
>>65061473
I think it's the single-engine design. Just makes her look complete, balanced, and efficient. A strong machine soul

>>65061479
f22 looks too 'skinny'
f35 has curves while having that sleek stealth aesthetic

>>65061563
This meme is so cringe, I like my girls skinny you fat fuck

File: 1772409328158719.png (542.4 KB)

542.4 KB PNG

>>65061479
time to conversion therapy this faggot

>>65061614
>le muscle mommy
this guy is gay

>>65061645
>Liking women is gay
Post-modern internet has rotted your brain

>>65061645
muscly men don't look like that
you must be projecting your own appearance

>>65061645
actual fag

File: 54634.png (724.5 KB)

724.5 KB PNG

>>65061645

>>65061645
worse, he's a r*dditor

>>65061614
Second gayest, forced meme of all time. Only slightly less gay and forced than the chink copy of "slim amy" and I say that as an enjoyer of the F35 and muscular women. Seriously stop being a fag and trying to equate aircraft lines to women, it ruins my boner because I wanna stick my dick into her jet exhaust, I don't want to be reminded of female ass when I'm trying to jack it to a plane. It's like peanut butter and pickles, great separate but awful together

File: 1000026875.jpg (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB JPG

>>65061645
(Everyone disliked that)

>>65061473
>how is the f35 so aesthetically pleasing
It isn't and you're a homosexual who probably also thinks a Glock brand Blawk and your mallninja tacticool basic bitch PSA build are "aesthetically pleasing".

>>65062252
I was in the navy with this chick that wore workout shorts with no panties when we worked out together. I could definitely see her snatch every time we did situps and she was definitely doing it on purpose

>>65061473
I think the F-16, F-15, and F-14 are all more visually appealing. 4th gens and down have character. All these 5th gen stealth fighters are the aircraft equivalent of everyone using multicam and multicam derivatives.

>>65061660
They can.

Slim Amy would never get shot down like that... Shame on Fat Amy...

File: Chinas j35.jpg (258.4 KB)

258.4 KB JPG

>>65062317 Has the j35 even entered production yet?

>>65061648
>>65061660
>>65061828
>>65061946
>>65062252
I want to start off my post by saying I am not a homosexual

patrician, high class thinkers like myself prefer slim women, you just wouldn’t get it.
I am also not gay, unless getting pegged once makes me a fag(hint, it doesn’t)

>>65062384
Everyone is allowed one gay action in life and not be labeled gay for it, how else are you supposed to know if you're gay or not? However I will argue till my dying breath that anytime something goes up your ass and it isn't for medical purposes is gay

>>65061473
to me things that are physically stealth look sexy, all of them. even the fake chinese ones.

>>65061479
porque no los both

>>65061473
It's actually very ugly and you just have shit taste

File: 1754273366537792.jpg (116.7 KB)

116.7 KB JPG

>>65062325
Serial production began two years ago

>>65062419
that’s fair in all honesty

>>65062599
>reminder that the 2 engines in slim amy have less thrust together than the 1 in fat amy

>>65063381
You are now reminded of that one clip the chinks spam where slim has to full burn to get off the deck with a light load while fattie doesn't have her afterburner on to takeoff with more

>>65062384
If you have to argue that you're not gay, you're gay. That's just how it works.

>yet another stealth fighter thread

>>65063381
Janes says the two engines make 196kn normal and 230kn on afterburner vs the F-35's 125kn normal and 192kn on afterburner

>>65061489
>A strong machine soul
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztzq05IzYds

File: 181213-F-JG201-0104.png (908.8 KB)

908.8 KB PNG

>>65061473
looks good, flies good
the secret to US aviation supremacy

>>65062384
pegging is definitely the single gayest thing you can get up to in a monogamous heterosexual relationship
t. bisexual

>>65063982
According to Hoyle, nothing is gay if the balls don't touch. If you're "wife" has balls, I've got bad news for you, Nancy....

>>65063982
I'd argue it's gayer than being gay due to the denial and mental gymnastics involved. Same reason futa and traps are extra gay over standard yaoi

>>65061479
The F-22 is super fucking hot top model that is skinny but an absolute semen demon, whereas the F-35 is the big-breasted chick that is slightly muscular and has rock hard abs.

>>65062236
Jej

File: F-35B-third-day-of-war-2[1].jpg (227.8 KB)

227.8 KB JPG

I feel like it doesn't carry enough weapons, even in beast mode.

>>65061473
Everything good is beautiful. Everything bad is ugly

>>65067180
Nukes are beautiful and bad, though.

File: APe_01-52-1.jpg (899.9 KB)

899.9 KB JPG

>>65067093
Like this?

File: 1698122511620318.png (905 KB)

905 KB PNG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKMw2it8dQY

>>65061479
USAF crew chief here
I have seen them close up in person
F-35 is ugly as sin. It looks like the bastard child of a balloon, F-16, and F-18. The new chubby kid at school. It is ugly as sin in person. I have no idea how anyone could find it visually appealing.
The F-22 is gorgeous. What an absolutely sexy aircraft. It is just as pretty as it is in the photos.

>>65068167
That's only 2 extra fox 3s compared to the f-35, but the doubled up pylons is what I'm talking about. The f-35 could use some double or triple slot weapons.

>>65066301
Wow, since when does Japan have f-35s?

File: IMG_2605.jpg (131.4 KB)

131.4 KB JPG

>>65067093
They’re experimenting with letting the f-35 carry more munitions, but it’s just that there isn’t really a use case at the moment, especially for the US that has so many other platforms to act as fox-3 slingers.
You’d probably only see an f-35 carrying external munitions in militaries where it’s their only strike aircraft, like if Australia retires their f/a-18s or smth.

File: f-35c carrier landing.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

>>65068920
That's what all you flyboys say. You all call her "fat amy". I suspect the phenomenon is similar to how some people separate aesthetics from practicality, while others view practicality as perfection.

When I look at the f-35, all I see is peak performance.

>>65069469
Your image is dated to 2011. I don't think it's happening.

>>65069481
Yeah, the image and concept is old. As I said there’s just no use case, but if there was one they would be able to add multipylons and whatnot.
The US would rather just buy more f-15EXs though then make a stealth aircraft carry more bombs.
I probably should have said ‘they’ve experimented’ rather then ‘they’re experimenting’.

File: kf-21-1[1].jpg (588.3 KB)

588.3 KB JPG

>>65069493
The f-35 seems to be too limited by the initial scope of its design as a low tier stealth plane. The more modern concepts that everyone else are looking into generally have much internal weapon bays. Except the kf-21. South Korea isn't even trying.

>>65061645
Good job triggering all the closeters

>>65069474
Flyboy is a pilot. They fly the planes. I am a crew chief. I fix the planes. Those are different things.
I said they are ugly. Aesthetically displeasing to the eye. I did not say anything about the practicality or performance of the aircraft. Those are different things.
Has reading comprehension really gotten this bad?

File: IMG_2607.jpg (30.8 KB)

30.8 KB JPG

>>65069505
Thing is with the f-35 was that it wasn’t necessarily meant as a light stealth plane and more as a forward set of sensors for other platforms carrying the real payloads that had the capability to quietly remove any major threats to the 4th gen jets following them.
It’s advantage is its data link capabilities and sensor suite not its firepower, hence why the f-35 is slated for service for the next half century and the f-22 is fighting for an actual purpose since none of the threat it was meant to fight have ever manifested.
It isn’t completely dire though, pretty soon the internal payload of the f-35 will be getting a bump with smaller precision agms as well as upgraded racks for 6 total aamrams. It ain’t a carpet bomber but it’s more then capable of taking apart enemy forces.

>>65069640
>some people separate aesthetics from practicality, while others view practicality as perfection.
Has reading comprehension really gotten this bad?

>>65067753
Nukes are good though. Because of nukes we didn't have a direct war between 20 major economies of the world since WW2. Before the nukes such wars happened every 20 years

>>65069505
The KF-21 is supposed to get an internal weapons bay on a later model.

>>65076481
That's a poor marketing move. It makes customers not buy the initial product. They hold off until the later model is out. It deprives the company the crucial funding they need to make the "real" model. This is what killed the hudson H9.

>>65069710
I think people forget how small a plane it really is, too. It's barely bigger than a Viper. The whole reason it has shoe unflattering angles is because it's a tiny plane built around a single fuckhuge engine. That it has comparable internal weapons capacity to the Raptor is pretty impressive, and it's designed to allow for bigger A2G munitions that won't fit in an F-22.

>>65079340
>shoe unflattering angles
Those. Those unflattering angles. I don't even know how I managed to spell a word that wrong.