Thread #65077711
Anonymous
zhang analysis of tank technologies vs bomb quad technologies 04/15/26(Wed)06:33:24 No.65077711
zhang analysis of tank technologies vs bomb quad technologies 04/15/26(Wed)06:33:24 No.65077711
zhang analysis of tank technologies vs bomb quad technologies Anonymous 04/15/26(Wed)06:33:24 No.65077711 [Reply]▶
File: 1748317846670700.mp4 (4 MB)
4 MB MP4
is this accurate?
24 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
File: screenshot.jpg (717.5 KB)
717.5 KB JPG
>>65077711
there's nothing more chinese than running people over with a tank
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>65077854
they don't even need to, the answer for anti drone tech is always more drones
just swarm the tank from all direction and it cannot do anything
the bigger question is why would you need a tank anymore ?
tanks are use to bring heavy fire support to an advancing squad, well FPVs can do that for a fraction of the cost
it is sad but this is where we are now
>>
>>
File: CHINAH.jpg (19.1 KB)
19.1 KB JPG
>>65077749
>What are they ? protestors ?
>>
>>
>>65077711
Moist of the visual is redundant as all the pseudo stand-off armor is based on horrible Russian field improvisations that do fuck all but keep retards engaged (while calling the mounting of an entire shed on your fucking tank a “genius” move).
It also perfectly highlights how these drone swarms would need more than a dozen drone-munitions and pilots to take out a tank and that if signal intelligence and jamming is active in the area (as it should be) nothing but a wire guided drone-munition would be effective which leads to the microwave to just fry the drone and continue with the original purpose of the tank of breaking through the enemy defensive line.
Either signal intelligence is going to pinpoint all of the cunts using the drones and vaporize them with CAS or Artillery or we’re going to see the return of modernized and miniaturized SPAAG’s meant to counter entire swarms of shitty and not so shitty drone munitions.
>>
>>
>>65077854
they have devices that detect enemy quadcopter video transmissions (since those tend to be high power and wide bandwidth so they are easy to detect) where they beep when a drone is nearby and even show you the video feed. soldiers in the tank activate the jammer when the drone is near not just blasting 24/7 where they'd even jam friendly radio
so yea they might have a very rough triangulation of your jamming signal only when they already know where you are from the drone
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: FalklandsWaverly82.jpg (2.6 MB)
2.6 MB JPG
>>65078486
Dont speak Chinese but looks like a good video. Even has mines and artillary at the end.
>>
>>65079901
That's not Warthunder.
>>65078477
Do you even know what you're talking about? The entire video is about the effectiveness of anti-drone/counter-measures that Russia has tried during the war. Not trying to hype up Chinese shit. Did you even watch it? Rhetorical question.
>>
>>
>>
>>65077711
>is this accurate?
Its essentially an animated k thread on the topic. I couldn't find anything egregiously wrong with it, besides the very last countermeasure which I know little about. Entirely possible that it could be mitigated with a simple aluminum box around the electronics, though cameras may still be vulnerable and without them these drones are useless.