>>43837776
kekekek

>>43837776
mogs me

>>43837776
They're all fetishists. The ones who dress in women's clothing and look like every other woman just have a more realistic view of how women tend to dress. This one is just more blatant because he thinks "woman" = "tutu" and clearly has no idea how any woman around him dresses. It's a spectrum of more blatantly sexist fetishists and sophisticated fetishists that can hide more easily.

>>43837776
Why tf did she where that pink dress. Just wear a normal sweater with jeans or something

>>43837776
that's crazy dude i unironically fucked that guy in a rofo bathroom in delaware in 2023

>>43837776
I’ve genuinely seen cis women dress like that this is just the crime of being ugly

>>43837776
That's me!

>>43837776
this is just your average elementary school teacher in California

>>43837776
These are the people who say "optics don't matter!" btw

>>43837829
good thing you didn't ironically fuck him because that would've been really gay

>performing your fetishes in public should be illegal
No it shouldn't. Straight people are fine with women wearing suggestive outfits in public but queer people can't do that? Not to mention that having a fetish is not purely sexual, just like any attraction it has both sexual and non-sexual modes. People just don't want to re-evaluate their misconceptions about these things. Obviously straight up being naked or waving dildoes around is beyond suggestive, I am only talking about things that are no more "obscene" that whatever suggestive skimpy fashion women often wear.

>>43837829
Just, why?

>>43837776
Obv it's you, op

>>43837776
I look like this and I want to see your manager.

>>43837776
would

>>43837776
>Wearing dresses is a fetish
Based and burkapilled.

>>43837776
thats my son

It's so christpilled

nobody would blink an eye if it was a pretty 15 year old girl doing it

At what point is the line drawn at sissy fetishist and gorillahon

>>43837776
>HollyGrayle

lmao

>Dr. Thunder himself is out there trying to sell people his soda
>Some cunt on twitter complains about it

>>43837829
hope you aint get AIDS

>>43839089
>Straight people are fine with women wearing suggestive outfits
if this isnt ragebait i'd like to inform you that 80% of people are not fine with that, cis women are just let off the hook more often because if you try to argue that they shouldnt dress like that they will karen and whore out at you, and nobody wants to deal with a whore woman.

>>43837776
Just your typical republican

>>43840983
No, everyone is completely fine with that. Men love women in skimpy outfits. The "waaaah degenerate whores" kind of thinking is purely 4chan incel shut in thing. And even 4chan incel shut ins complain constantly that femenism made it so there aren't any women in sexy skimpy outfits in the media.

>>43838043
you have never stepped foot in calufornia and your only 100 mile food source is walmart, dollar tree, and wendys.

>>43841024
I dont know where you got this from but ask any person male or female they will likely say its weird for women to dress like that, and in majority of places its against the dress code so they are legally not allowed to dress like that in the first place.

>4chan incel shut ins complain constantly
if its constantly then I would've probably seen it at least once already, I think your just imagining things anon...

>>43837829
Did he poz you or did you poz him?

I would rather look at that person than Holly Grayle's profile picture. Ugly and soulless. Meanwhile this lovely lady is EXPRESSING HER CREATIVITY!

>>43837776
Where do adult-sized trannies even find these dresses?
t. 4'11.5 tranny

>>43837776
That's me if I stopped giving a fuck what people think about the clothes I'm wearing

File: 1760264453443179.jpg (144.1 KB)

>>43837776
Total Hon Death

>>43841111
>Walmart has a dress code
Damn bro you're cracking me up
It'd be seen as weird but it wouldn't be seen as inherently sexual. Entirely because the person wearing it looks male this comes across as wearing sissy fetish gear in public.

>>43845173
>It'd be seen as weird but it wouldn't be seen as inherently sexual.
I saw a girl with short shorts in public before and felt as weird and awkward as if she was a 6'0 hon.
I think its weird because it comes off as sexual and showing yourself off in a public place where you shouldnt be doing that.
but maybe thats just me, some people have so much transphobia I guess they're ok with a woman damn near wearing a tight bikini in a walmart but it crosses the line when its a man dressing like a girl, I feel like a sane person wouldnt be ok with both though.
AFAIK though majority of places do have dress codes, like you cant obviously walk into a restaurant only hiding your nipples and wearing very small shorts, they'll kick you out.
>the person wearing it looks male this comes across as wearing sissy fetish gear in public.
cant disagree with that, its definitely weirder for a hon like OP posted instead of a cis woman. if you cant pass its not worth it to dress like a girl in public in my opinion.

>>43837776
>wearing clothes i dont like should be illegal

>>43845173
>>43846621
It comes off as purely sexual out if unfamiliarity and stereotypes about what having a fetish actually is. ANY attraction, including a fixation like a fetish usually has both sexual and non sexual sides to it. This is something that should have been conceptualized from the start of the whole sexual liberation thing.

>>43846621
Short shorts are more universally sexualized though. Though for someone perceived as a man there's an extra element of transgression of gender roles.
A tutu does sort of the opposite of showing you off. Except I guess up top it's aggressively body shape concealing. Might be one reason hons like them.

Early in transition, once my boymode failed, I kinda dressed for plausible deniability. I didn't really try to loudly force the "girl" social signals and instead let people figure out for themselves what I was. But things were also different for me because I'm literally 4'11.5" and very not traditionally male shaped. I don't really think it's fair to impose my strategy on others,
But yeah maybe don't honmode at Walmart in a fucking tutu and red lipstick unless you're actively trying to get on libsoftiktok.

>>43846727
>I'm literally 4'11.5" and very not traditionally male shaped. I don't really think it's fair to impose my strategy on others,
im a cis male and quite ignorant on this topic but I feel like transgender comes off as the true looksmax its sad that if you dont pass society just doesnt accept you, the more time ive spent on /tttt/ the more I feel bad
>But yeah maybe don't honmode at Walmart in a fucking tutu and red lipstick unless you're actively trying to get on libsoftiktok.
trvke