>>43840389 >If you look, dress, or behave in any way or have any anatomical or physiological characteristics other than what I approve of, that means that you’re a slave to gender roles
>>43840438 >The person in the picture has androgenic characteristics and “uses feminine paraphernalia”. This means that he’s a slave to gender roles, even though no culture in the world expects a person who looks as this person does to dress as they do
>>43840480 Never once in history ever. There are no women who have sideburns, shave, or bleach their facial hair. That's all just low-key products for trans women
>>43840560 I watch these videos of a ghetto black woman waxing other black women who have thicc beards. Trannies here would call them men. Its kinda relaxing to watch.
>>43840480 Some girls and women are more hairy than average females and naturally grow a little facial hair. If they have polycystic ovary syndrom sometimes they grow facial hair. If they take t they will grow facial hair too. Why?
>>43840389 I concur. We should all live as one unified homogeneous shape and mind, albeit with the freedom to have varying (now ungendered) hobbies and interests.
>>43840558 >If you look, dress, or behave in any way or have any anatomical or physiological characteristics other than what I approve of, that means that you’re a slave to gender roles >The person in the picture has androgenic characteristics and “uses feminine paraphernalia”. This means that he’s a slave to gender roles, even though no culture in the world expects a person who looks as this person does to dress as they do
>>43840389 because being socially conforming = positive attention being gendr conforming = no unconscious reverse dysphoria being you = massive faggotyr
>>43841168 >WAAH TRANNIES TRANNIES TRANNIES LET ME IMAGINE TRANNIES DOING THINGS IN YOUR RANDOM ASS THREAD AND HAVE 1200 TROGLODYTES CIRCLEJERK MY POST
Just as no one perfectly fits gender roles, no one is really absolutely free from them. Everyone adapts in some way and makes concessions simply by living in society.
>>43841197 >>43841422 It will never be the case that all trans people hold the beliefs or do the behaviours that you arbitrarily assign to them, no matter how many times you insist otherwise.
>>43841383 I don’t think that any one actually thinks that; I think that people who say things like that just hate trannies for aesthetic reasons and say things like that in an attempt to justify their hatred of trannies post hoc
>>43841894 It will never be the case that all trans people hold the beliefs or attitudes or do the behaviours that you arbitrarily assign to them, no matter how many times you insist otherwise.
>>43841364 Every single person who hates trans people hates them entirely for aesthetic reasons. Any and every other reason any person who hates trans people ever cites to explain why they hate trans people has been invented post hoc to attempt to justify their bigotry; all such claims are lies. There are no exceptions to this whatsoever.
>>43841987 This is a lie. You hate trans people for aesthetic reasons and you’ve invented the claim (or are repeating the false claim that someone else invented) that trans people “spread homophobia” to attempt to justify your bigotry post hoc. I’m not falling for it. It will never be the case that all trans people do the behaviours that you arbitrarily assign to them, no matter how many times you insist otherwise. Shut the fuck up. Do not reply to this post. >>43841995 I’m not falling for your samefaggotry.
>>43842085 homosexuality cannot be cured with cross sex hormones the concept of "straight trans people" imply otherwise go be homophobia in a pit of boiling lava
>>43842106 Correct, homosexualitu cannot be cured, because homosexuality is not an illness. The concept of “straight trans people” doesn’t imply anything at all. The meanings that you assign to things do not inhere in the things themselves. Squirt Sriracha sauce up your urethra.
>>43842170 No, it doesn’t. “Gender Dysphoria” is a fictitious mental illness invented by cissexist doctors in the ’70s in an effort to pathologize transsexuality and restrict access to sex change procedures—it has nothing to say about homosexuality at all. Furthermore, homosexuality is not classified as a disease in the DSM-5 (the same book in which “Gender Dysphoria” is described). The blatantly false claims that you make will never become true, no matter how many variations of them you repeat. Whether a claim is true doesn’t depend on whether you think that it’s true or not. Swallow razor blades.
>>43841367 >Just as no one perfectly fits gender roles, no one is really absolutely free from them. Everyone adapts in some way and makes concessions simply by living in society. if only that was the actual argument being made, some sense of a discourse could happen.
>>43841900 >It will never be the case that all bi people hold the beliefs or attitudes or do the behaviours that you arbitrarily assign to them, no matter how many times you insist otherwise. >It will never be the case that all cis people hold the beliefs or attitudes or do the behaviours that you arbitrarily assign to them, no matter how many times you insist otherwise. >>It will never be the case that all moids hold the beliefs or attitudes or do the behaviours that you arbitrarily assign to them, no matter how many times you insist otherwise. which one of those are you gonna balk at?
>>43842230 >Homosexuality was originally added to the first edition of the DSM in 1952 as a "sociopathic personality disturbance". Lol damn. Was only removed from the DSM in 1987 due to political correctness.
>>43840389 No. most people do what feels right and natural to them. Most of them feel they are the proper gender roles and gladly accept those roles and feel no need to question it because its just feels right and nature rules