//lgbt/
Trans women are truly biologically female only if they had SRS, which makes the transsexual distinction very useful. Why are people moving away from it now?
Showing all 30 replies.
>>
>>43844580
I don't like that smile, she looks too happy. People who are happy should be fixed. There is no reason to be that happy. God I hate happy people. Everyone should be miserable like me.
>>
>>43844580
probably because changing your genitals is an expensive surgery and the majority of their partners WANT the penis
>>
>>43844590
she is cute
>>
>>43844623
not really, i'm pretty sure like 99% of
men prefer women with a pussy over women with a dick
>>
>>43844639
yes im saying of the pool of their viable partners (those attracted to them) the majority prefers them to have a penis, i don't know how big the majority is, but it's certainly over 50%
>>
>if i change the shape of my penis i will become biologically female
>>
>>43844663
>their viable partners
you mean their viable partners while they still have a dick? because that pool expands from just chasers to all straight men when you get srs
>>
>>43844676
oh no i don't mean that, i mean the surgery where they give you a normal, functional vagina made of bioidentical tissue
>>
>>43844698
which surgeon can make a bioidentical vaginal canal, a cervix, a uterus and ovaries? let me know please!
>>
>>43844580
How does one convince themselves that getting SRS makes you female? Asking for a friend
>>
>>43844728
vaginal canal and cervix? basically every surgeon. a uterus and ovaries aren't part of the vagina though so idk how that's relevant here
>>
>>43844775
>vaginal canal and cervix? basically every surgeon.
ah, ok. you are genuinely retarded
>>
>>43844580
because most trans people in queer spaces are early transition or hons and people with srs are more likely to move on (generally speaking)

so when you start saying "you need to get srs to be female" everyone who sees that is either people who are only trans online, babytrans, or very broke nonfunctional people who lash out at having their womanhood attacked. almost everyone who would agree with it that already fucked off years ago. not saying its not a valid complaint that you can't get srs in this exact moment but it doesn't make the original statement wrong

>>43844728
this has always been a retarded argument, first of all are you currently using your balls? plans to become a father? foh

its all harm reduction from being born fucked up and the difference between a srsussy and a full on dick is light years apart even if science can't get you a womb yet
>>
>>43844786
how?
>>
>>43844752
It makes you intersex* if you want to put it that way, but still way closer to a female than a male. Calling them a female with a mild chromosomal disorder would probably be the most accurate description
>>
>>43844580
Srsoids still lack a vagina, XX chromosomes or a uterus.
>>
>>43844791
>this has always been a retarded argument
>words dont matter, their meaning should vary according to how i feel!
yes. it's harm reduction. yes, it alleviates dysphoria. no, it doesnt make you female
>>43844793
no surgeon makes a cervix. the vaginal canal is not made with bioidentical tissue, and to be biologically female you would need to have ovaries
>>
>>43844580
I enjoy srsussy and thock as much as the next person but I'm also not dumb enough to be insensitive to those with genital dysphoria coping with subpar procedures to find some semblance of happiness nor to those who don't have genital dysphy, can't afford it, or whatever other reason
>>
>>43844862
>no surgeon makes a cervix. the vaginal canal is not made with bioidentical tissue
they do though, and it is
>and to be biologically female you would need to have ovaries
refer to >>43844827
>>
>>43844875
>they do though
LOL
yes, i agree that you are not male after HRT, or orchi, or SRS, etc. but you are also not female
>>
>>43844875
So by this logic my anus and colon was a pussy all along and I don't need srs to be a woman. Thank you for the affirmations
>>
>>43844827
Mm, no, and I think the suggestion that getting a surgery at 30 makes you intersex is somewhat offensive to people with real intersex conditions (not counting gender incongruence)
The surgeon attempts to artificially approximate the characteristics of a female body, with middling success at best. It’s not like HRT which literally makes your body “more female”. I’m glad some people can cope with the delusion that SRS “makes them female” but it just doesn’t, and I’m sick of this discourse, just let people get it done if they’re ok with the tradeoffs and leave it if they don’t
>>
>>43844580
Yes srs is prerequisite for meekness
>>
>>43844926
it literally does make you "more female" as a vagina and dick are different arrangements of the same tissue under different hormonal regimes

some methods put more or the homologous tissue in the right places therefore make you even more female but since genital sex is effectively a bimodal distribution anyway any srs is going to take you over to the other mode
>>
>>43844894
?
>>43844893
you are female though, that's not really something you can argue with
>>
>>43844988
>you are female though
thanks
>>
>>43844580
True boyremoval is only possible post srs
>>
>>43844580
"truly biologically female" is a fake and stupid thing to care about
medically there are good reasons to care about individual traits, like "does this person have a uterus" and "what are this person's hormone levels" but answering the question "does this person check off all of these boxes" tells you nothing that the individual traits themselves don't
you don't unlock a set bonus when you complete the list or some shit like that
>>
A castrated male with his penis cut off and inverted inside a surgically created wound that tries to heal is not a biological female. Just facts. Deal with it.
>>
>>43846194
biologically male/female is a thing but its not a very useful thing to fixate on when trannies and intersex exist

Reply to Thread #43844580


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)