Those frogs did literally nothing of consequence (except create more troons) I think you’re giving them too much credit.

>>25211102
haven't read derrida since undergrad - but deleuze is no more a 'philosopher of decomposition' than carpenters can be considered destroyers of wood.

also this is guy >>25211104 is right at least in the sense that the world derrida and deleuze came into was already one of rapid unceasing decomposition - 'all that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned' is how marx described the movement of capitalism - and it's silly to say that that's all the result of philosophy books. it's simply the historical starting point we all have to face up to.

>>25211170
[cont.] i mean one of the most important tasks for deleuze is figuring out how to construct what he calls a plane of consistency, a stable background against which differences become meaningful. how does that fit into you philosopher-of-decomposition frame?

>>25211104
The very concept of identity is undermined by difference; what we are seeing is a widespread identity crisis in the West, and Troons are a manifestation of this.

>>25211172
We are all children of our time—a gift. But we also help shape it. Hence a counter-question: How is consistency possible without stability, hierarchy, and identity? Or to put it another way—when Deleuze speaks of a “plane of consistency”—isn’t consistency itself already a form of stability? How does this stability differ from the kind he criticizes?

>>25211188
I think people who are too stupid to write their own posts should be put in labor camps.

>>25211241
> Calls for labour camps because he is unable to answer questions

>>25211102
>who have, without irony, contributed metaphysically to the disorientation of the West
why do i give a shit about those influencers? who did they influence