Showing all 59 replies.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>25322251
He is right though? Hence why every single fascist dictator has been overthrown/voted out/had their countries become liberal democracies and why the USSR fell and why China is a state capitalist shithole.
>>
Fascism and Communism might be different in theory but they're very similar on a psychological level. Hence why so many former socialists became fascists and national socialists and after the war former Nazis integrated into the East German government and secret police quite easily. Its no surprise that people sympathetic to totalitarianism don't care which particular flavor of totalitarianism ends up winning.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>25322430
buzzword after buzzword zzz...
what does 'psychological' even mean here? entirely unsubstantiated statement without a lick of objective merit here, rather riddled with subjective vibes based value judgements. Wittgenstein once said that whereof one cannot speak thereof one should be silent. ergo, dont say useless babble. Read Lakatos too while youre at it, what you've said is an entirely degenerating programme with nothing productive in terms of novel predictions provided -- hence, what you've said is pseudo science! This is easily observable by the fact that 'totalitarianism' is a defining trait of a litany of (declining/failed) liberal states; state apparatuses in the west have consolidated their powers in numerous manners -- the UK have amended the POA 1986 (2023) to introduce a levy of powers to criminalise demonstrations, Palestine Action have been labelled a a terrorist group on frivolous grounds, the OSA has entirely changed the landscape of British internet usage (one of the few countries also looking to ban VPNs, etc). This isn't even to touch on the encroaching right populist authoritarian tendencies polling high atm seeking to introduce biometric chips in the name of 'tracking' immigrants. If you knew anything about the residual freedoms common law position you'd realise how exposed the average citizen is to a loss of civil liberties. The live facial recognition software employed/due to be deployed across much of the UK is another example.If you wanted to invoke Spinoza's idea that people fight for their servitude as if their salvation, that would be interesting. but nooo, you've just dropped the most boring of buzzword statements.
I can touch on a litany of US instances too but something tells me you wouldn't care either way.
Have you read Wilhelm Reich's seminal book the mass psychology of fascism? Do you even know how fascism arose? Do you think that 'drumpf' is literally fascist? Absurd statements like yours betrays your absolute inadequate knowledge on anything historical, philosophical, economic or political. Let alone psychological.
Gynozog cuck faggot kys
>>
>>25322257
Fpbp
>>25322260
Spsbp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: conspiracy_kgb_screenshot2_large.png (216.6 KB)
>>25322430
>Fascism and Communism might be different in theory but they're very similar on a psychological level. Hence why so many former socialists became fascists and national socialists and after the war former Nazis integrated into the East German government and secret police quite easily.
How many of those were actual ideologues compared to functionaries though. That might say something about the similarity of the two systems but the bureaucracy selected for a low-cunning, self-interested "hierarchy of flotsam and jetsam." Maybe people who make for good storm troopers are compatible with a variety of different systems that depend on them.
https://youtu.be/SFo-hbTGbPY
>>
>>25322430
>Fascism and Communism might be different in theory
They're very similar in theory, being two forms of authoritarian collectivism.
The only difference is the nationalist basis of fascism, which opposes the internationalist nature of communism.
>>
>>25322430
>>25324211
>Totalitarianism
>Authoritarianism
IQ capped at 105 terminology
>>
>>
>>25324211
This: >>25324776. Fascism is authoritarian whereas communism is totalitarian, retard.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1779932472968160.png (144.6 KB)
>>25322251
>Ideologii iz gonorea :DD
>meenwhile polisii - 10 bazillion dollers to izbareel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Untitled.png (13.9 KB)
>>25324776
>>25324786
>fascism isn't totalitarian
How many political parties were there in Nazi Germany, dumbfucks?
>>
>>25325878
My first thoughts too. Lord of the Rings is almost completely apolitical (other than the obvious environmental themes) and acts as a sort of old fable story you would read about from a far away place.
The fact that Communism, Fascism, and modern day politics are coming into the fold to an apolitical story only shows how dead our collective society's imagination truly is.
>>
>>25325878
>>25326518
Tom Shippey thinks it suggests political lessons, and he knows more about Tolkien than anybody.
>There's no doubt really that The Lord of the Rings was very much affected not only by industrialized warfare but also by the sad history of the 20th Century. All the kind of revolutions which were supposed to make things better, which made things worse instead. And that's really one of the striking messages of the the work. Power is addictive. No one can be trusted with it. Surely that's exactly what the book says. The ring is addictive. No one can resist it, no one is safe with it, so you have to
destroy it. You cannot use it for something; even good causes are not a good justification.
https://youtu.be/jzTe8by6mDs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>25326829
>No one can resist it, no one is safe with it, so you have to destroy it. You cannot use it for something; even good causes are not a good justification.
I don't think it makes an argument in favor of luddite society, Anon. Aragorn is able to use the palantir, Sauron worried he would have been able to master the Ring, whether that's true or not, power (authority) can be good. The age of men will demystify everything. But it does make a statement about absolute evil and its relation to power.
>>
>>25326908
Is this bait?
>In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/
>>
>>
>>
What's the tax policy in Valinor I need to know if Tolkien's ideal land has high or low corporation tax to base my entire opinion on reality's fiscal policy on?
Is Valinor a welfare state?
I can't imagine Frodo sailing west after saving middle earth and being hit with a 40 hour work week. Surely Frodo would get disability benefits after getting stabbed at weathertop.
Not his fault he's disabled now, it was the wrong place, wrong time. Mordor and Isengard should compensate him but I imagine they're too busy paying war reparations.
But should the Valar have to work harder just so the hobbit can shirk work?
>>
>>25327900
>Aragorn is able to use the palantir, Sauron worried he would have been able to master the Ring, whether that's true or not, power (authority) can be good
So Aragorn, Gandalf, and Galadriel refusing to use the Ring was a foolish mistake? This is so anti-Tolkien.
>But it does make a statement about absolute evil and its relation to power
What is the statement?
>>
>>