File: kn.png (106.2 KB)
Daily reminder that "akrasia" or "weakness of will" (the idea that one can do something one "knows" to be wrong in any significant sense) is not real, and that every single argument to the contrary can be proven to either be circular or rest on a surreptitious equivocation of terms.
Showing all 15 replies.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>25329218
but Wang Yangming rejected akrasia, anon.
Nishida actually quotes him on that. I'd go as far as saying that Wang's position on the matter is basically the same as Aristotle's when he states that to have practical knowledge just means to act on it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>25327949
Out of curiosity, how would this position analyze the famous pear tree passage in Augustus's confessions?
>We carried off a huge load of pears, not to eat ourselves, but to dump out to the hogs, after barely tasting some of them ourselves. Doing this pleased us all the more because it was forbidden. Such was my heart, O God, such was my heart–which thou didst pity even in that bottomless pit. Behold, now let my heart confess to thee what it was seeking there, when I was being gratuitously wanton, having no inducement to evil but the evil itself. It was foul, and I loved it; I loved to perish, I loved mine own fault, not that for which I was faulty, but my fault itself. Foul soul, falling from Thy firmament to utter destruction; not seeking aught through the shame, but the shame itself!
Im neither religious nor philosophically committed to any Augustinian view but it seems like a fairly clear counter-example to me.
>>
>>25329621
Retrospective perspectival change in what he loved about it rather than just admitting he was being a hedonistic and revelling in the joy of damaging others. The 'him' that did this did not think he was perishing, did not think what he was doing was truly a fault, etc. It's an ex post facto rationalization of the fact after all, doesn't seem too hard to explain.