Thread #1505089
Anonymous
Melania Trump’s Speech Denying Epstein Links Renews Attention to Trump's Cover Up 04/10/26(Fri)18:06:50 No.1505089
Melania Trump’s Speech Denying Epstein Links Renews Attention to Trump's Cover Up 04/10/26(Fri)18:06:50 No.1505089
Melania Trump’s Speech Denying Epstein Links Renews Attention to Trump's Cover Up Anonymous 04/10/26(Fri)18:06:50 No.1505089 [Reply]▶
File: 1749461944458261.png (322.2 KB)
322.2 KB PNG
On Thursday afternoon, first lady Melania Trump gave a speech in which she said she had no direct associations with disgraced convicted sex offenders Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, reigniting the Epstein scandal for the Trump administration.
It was known earlier this week that the first lady would be giving a speech, but the subject matter was not announced beforehand. In her missive, Trump said she wanted to speak out against purported “lies” being made about her relating to Epstein and Maxwell.
“The lies linking me with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today,” Trump said, adding that those promulgating the commentaries “are devoid of ethical standards, humility, and respect.”
Very few, if any, reputable media outlets have pushed the accusations that Trump spoke about, which included rumors about her purportedly being introduced to her husband, President Donald Trump, by Epstein on the latter’s plane. A statement from a former employee of Epstein’s did suggest that the couple met that way, but other past reports demonstrate the two met at a party in 1998, unrelated to the disgraced financier, although Donald Trump was friends with Epstein at the time.
Melania Trump’s statement was unusual, in that she hasn’t faced much in terms of scrutiny, compared to her husband, regarding her personal connection to Epstein.
Trump claimed she never had a friendship with Epstein or Maxwell. She also said a 2002 email to Maxwell from her was an “email reply” that shouldn’t be “categorized as anything more than casual correspondence.”
“My polite reply to her email doesn’t amount to anything more than a trivial note,” Trump insisted.
However, the email’s text, revealed in a recent round of the Epstein files being released, suggests it was more personal than Trump lets on.
https://truthout.org/articles/melania-trumps-speech-denying-epstein-li nks-renews-attention-to-the-scandal /
68 RepliesView Thread
>>
Melania Trump asks Maxwell, addressed as “G” in the message, about her time in Palm Beach, and relates to her that she “cannot wait to go down” to the area herself. She comments positively about Epstein’s inclusion in a magazine, and tells Maxwell to make contact with her in the near future.
“Give me a call when you are back in NY. Have a great time!” Trump wrote, signing off with “Love” at the end of the email.
It’s unclear why the first lady felt the need to address these theories about her, which have not been widespread or reported on in mainstream media, and up until her speech amounted to little more than a rumor pushed by a former Epstein employee. Melania Trump is also not a large part of the Epstein saga, and for the better part of the past month news about the Epstein files, and the administration’s failures to make them public, has been drowned out by the president’s decision to start a war with Iran.
Asked about his wife’s comments, Donald Trump told MS NOW reporter Jacqueline Alemany that he didn’t “know anything about” his wife’s planned statement before she spoke. He also said Melania Trump didn’t know Epstein before hanging up the phone on Alemany.
However, CNN reported that Trump “was aware” that the first lady had planned to speak on Thursday. Given how controlling of the narrative the Trump administration prefers to be, it would be highly unusual for him or those in his office not to know what she was planning to say.
Following Melania Trump’s speech, a group of Epstein survivors spoke out against her insistence that they testify publicly before Congress about his alleged crimes and connections to other high profile individuals, saying her demand unfairly “shift[ed] the burden onto survivors under politicized conditions to protect those with power.”
>>
“Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein have already shown extraordinary courage by coming forward, filing reports, and giving testimony. Asking more of them now is a deflection of responsibility, not justice,” the survivors said in their statement.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1505099
And what was the legal context of releasing those files when there was an active federal trial and appeallate process for one defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell?
You bots, shills are lazy because there is no other reality to twist with the Garland-Biden name drops. They legally couldn't release the files then Trump took up the mantle on the campaign trail, and you always give "idiots" enough rope to hang themselves with
>>
>>1505222
Okay so Merrick Garland was waiting on releasing the files because the Maxwell trial was still pending.
How many pedos in the files did Merrick Garland end up prosecuting with Maxwell's help?
What was Biden's DoJ able to do with the extra time that they weren't releasing the files?
>>
>>1505259
NTA but yeah you're fundamentally misunderstanding this.
Maxwell did not cooperate. Until her appeals were finished the files were sealed. If the files were sealed they cannot be used as basis for prosecutions.
>>
>>1505260
Why?
They weren't her files
Let's use some specific examples. Prince Andrew lost his royal status because of the Epstein scandal. Prince Andrew was introduced to Epstein in 1999 via Maxwell.
What was preventing Attorney General Merrick Garland from releasing emails between Andrew and Epstein? How did her trial seal emails that weren't from her, or to her?
>>
>>1505267
>They weren't her files
But they were being used in her case.
>Let's use some specific examples. Prince Andrew lost his royal status because of the Epstein scandal. Prince Andrew was introduced to Epstein in 1999 via Maxwell.
This literally happened well after Garland wasn't in his position anymore.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1505354
Nah, OP disguised himself as a priest to rape boys, then made fun of the church because he raped boys. After OP was let out of prison he met a man, became a husband and the couple adopted a boy to rape as the fags do.
Every Friday night their child suffers from homophobia when his two dads get back from The Dungeon, a bar with untraceable illegal brown men to rape, with a tube of KY.
OP is a fag and nothing can change that.
>>
>>
>>
>>1505362
I hear tell, OP changed his name to Sheroy, and demanded everyone uses female pronouns after he cut his dick off. Everyone knows he's make, but at work everyone is forced to comply. OP doesn't know that everyone hates him and laughs at his male pattern baldness. What a fag.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1505099
> Campaigned on releasing all files
> Got into office and did a complete 180
> Was FORCED to release files with the discharge petition creating the Epstein Transparency Act
> Still hasn't released all the files and is breaking the law
You can't rewrite history. Good job apologizing for pedos though you absolute piece of shit.
>>
>>1505574
Did Biden campaign on releasing the files?
What about his Attorney General Merrick Garland?
I don't seem to remember Joe Biden saying "Yes I will release the files". I don't remember him saying "No I won't release the files and here's why"
It just seems like they wanted to force Donald Trump to answer questions about Epstein, and were completely uninterested in what Biden had to say about Epstein
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>