>While asserting she was neither one of Epstein’s victims nor introduced to Donald Trump by the financier, Melania, 56, called for public congressional hearings on behalf of survivors, a move some critics say could cause further pain.

>Massie was at the forefront of the push for the release of the Epstein files, sparking a torrent of hate from the president.

>The Trump critic has vowed to spend his final seven months in office continuing to push for transparency, after having joined Ro Khanna in naming billionaire Leon Black, banker Jes Staley, and businessman Leslie Wexner as three names originally redacted in the files—along with six others they described as “likely implicated” in Epstein’s orbit.

Yeah no shit. She was an Epstein girl and she met Trump through him.

>>1516682
You're on a watch list now for saying that out loud.

>>1516686
we are all still watching and waiting for the list

>>1516622
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMyxFtSs1-4

>>1516689
The Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law by Donald J. Trump in November 2025, requires the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to publicly release all unclassified records, communications, and investigative materials related to the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.The DOJ has published over 3.5 million pages of responsive documents, videos, and images in compliance with the act.
How many of those 3.5 million pages did you read after getting what you were waiting for?

>>1516692
every reference to Trump is blacked out. Explain that.

In fact, explain why ANY names are blacked out on the list.

>>1516693
That's not true though
People said Trump's name are all over the files. Like when he talks about meeting with the Trump sons or going to Trumps for Thanksgiving

Massie losing has now allowed him all his time to do the podcast circuit and shout about releasing the Epstein files.

>>1516694
The truth is they claimed the redacted names were victims, and then when some unredacted files were shown to contain names that were redacted that clearly weren’t victims they said nothing. If they aren’t hiding anything they don’t need to lie about anything. The 3.5m isn’t even most of the files apparently there’s 11m total.

>>1516705
Look out for his book he's baiting you into buying.
Going on podcasts hinting at shit is useless Democratshit.

>>1516706
How does it make you feel that Democrats have access to the unredacted info and are withholding it?

>>1516716
unsurprised. Pelosi had the whole report and just shelved it.

>>1516716
I dunno. How does it feel to look at the entire government covering up a massive pedophile ring, and to be such a disingenuous dipshit you only blame the half you don't like?

How is that a win? "Dems have access to the same files as the red re-res, and neither side releasing them somehow only reflects poorly on them.

Fuck you shill.

>>1516716
Feel? I think there’s a uniparty. Not all the members of both parties but enough of them, look at AIPAC funding across both sides and see how both sides treat Israel. This is all connected to Epstein of course.

>>1516715
It’s not useless if it keeps the issue in the public consciousness.

>>1516721
>blame the half you don't like?
Because you still haven't woken up. You're parroting lefty talking points about the Epstein files while still needing the government to release them before the ramifications fully sink in.

>>1516721
About as good as you trying to pin Epstein on Trump to win the midterms.

>>1516692
The files have not been fully released.
>Justice Department withheld and removed some Epstein files related to Trump
Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-5723968/epstein-files-trump-accusation-maxwell
>Federal prosecutors had identified 6 million files that were ‘potentially responsive’ to the law, but only released 3.5. Why?
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/31/jeffrey-epstein-unreleased-files

>>1516716
>How does it make you feel that Democrats have access to the unredacted info and are withholding it?
>>1516717
>>1516722
>>1516721
>>1516746

Wrong.


They don't have unrestricted access. They can only view it at a painstakingly slow pace.

>Representatives Jamie Raskin, a Democrat, and Lauren Boebert, a Republican, were among the lawmakers who viewed the documents on Monday.

>"I think there are folks who are definitely implicated" named in the files, Boebert said.

>Raskin complained that the limited way in which lawmakers could view the unredacted files amounts to a "cover up".

>"The DoJ is giving Members of Congress just four computers in a satellite office to read the unredacted Epstein File of more than 3 million documents," he wrote on X, calculating that it would take Congress seven years to read it all.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn5gzepnw4lo
They aren't allowed to share them directly:
>To access the files, lawmakers will need to give the Justice Department 24 hours’ notice. They will be able to review the files on computers at the Department of Justice. Only lawmakers, not their staff, will have access to the files, and they will be permitted to take notes, but not make electronic copies.
https://apnews.com/article/epstein-files-congress-unredacted-justice-department-5219f89459e80a141b84e1aa2551b0d2

DOJ’s current process for congressional review makes meaningful oversight impossible. Members are only allowed to review documents on four DOJ computers located at a satellite office that is open only during business hours. At that pace, it would take more than seven years for Members to review even the limited set of files DOJ has made available.

>https://jayapal.house.gov/2026/03/23/judiciary-oversight-democrats-demand-doj-take-5-steps-toward-epstein-file-transparency/

>>1516692
>>1516693
>>1516694
>>1516706
>>1516716
>>1516721
>>1516722
>>1516746
>>1516770
You guys haven't ready any of the Epstein files. You are just getting your news from the media telling you what is in the files, you didn't read shit yourself.

>>1516774
>They don't have unrestricted access.
>Unredacted
>Unrestricted
>Fails to read
>Complains about it.
EOD they have access to the information. Therefore they're hiding it if it exists,

>>1516784
Read the post above yours
>Members are only allowed to review documents on four DOJ computers located at a satellite office that is open only during business hours. At that pace, it would take more than seven years for Members to review even the limited set of files DOJ has made available.

That is not "unrestricted". There are hundreds of members of congress, yet only 4 computers
They don't even have all of the files there.

>>1516825
Read my post here >>1516716
And the restrictions likely exist to prevent abuse since they have access to the UNREDACTED files.

>>1516880
so do you fuck kids too

>>1516716
They have given info from the unredacted files:

>The document in question was an email forward from Epstein to his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, from 2009, which was just after the late billionaire's 2008 conviction on charges of procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute. The email exchange apparently recounted a conversation between lawyers for Epstein and Trump.
>"Epstein's lawyers synopsized and quoted Trump as saying that Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of his club at Mar-a-Lago, but he was a guest at Mar-a-Lago, and he had never been asked to leave,
https://people.com/jamie-raskin-unredacted-epstein-file-trump-claim-11903119

different rep who viewed the unredacted files also said that trump didn't ban epstein from mar-a-lago:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LKWuBea3bos

>>1516776
Reddit is a reliable source chud.

>>1516911
>different rep who viewed the unredacted files also said that trump didn't ban epstein from mar-a-lago:
Yet Trump's DOJ ensured he was arrested and punished. Interesting.

>>1516915
have you ever not lied

>>1516915
they also reduced ghislaine maxwell's prison security

>>1516931
Yet she's in prison. Interesting.

>>1516622
how long till Israel suicides this guy?

>>1516759
>win the midterms.
The American people have lost every election for decades.
You unironically support pedophiles, ironically kys

>>1516933
If he dies mysteriously it will only make him seem more correct

>>1516932
Pedophile defenders unite, huh? Keep running defense for child fuckers you stupid cunt. Let us know when a rich white man fucks your child in the ass, but a country club prison where they get to play with puppies and order their food from private chefs is good enough punishment for his crime.

>>1516933
They don't have any blackmail material on him or he wouldn't be so brazen, it would have to be a staged murder with a patsy and too many loose ends.
Instead the US establishment will freeze him out, much more effective.

>>1516934
I think we won in 2016 and 2024, thus the complaining, constant bitching, from the corporate, publicly traded, media fags.

>>1516935
Just like Navalny, Prigozhin, etc? The current phase is consolidation of power, not more accountability.

>>1516715
I just love that you think going on podcasts is "useless Democratshit". I really do.

>>1516980
No, you don't think, if you thought you'd understand that's a really fucking stupid thing to say.

>>1516980
No you didn't, I didn't vote for anyone in 2024 because I am not voting for Dem or Republican pedos. And they all are

>>1517042
Not really. The stupid shit is coming from literal homosexuals like (You), who never got over being losers and have pushed scam after scam to gain power.

>>1517038
I love that you'll be buying the book.
I also love when fagwits reply ignoring key details.
You look super smart now.

>famously socializes with wealthy and connected people all over the world

>he didn't act alone.

NEWSFLASH!

>>1517057
Trump literally ran on releasing the Epstein files. Pam Bondi called rightwing podcasters to the White House 2 months after they took power and gave out binders full of Epstein files. She stated live on air that the Epstein files were sitting in her desk and full of pedophile evidence.

Republicans sponsored the bill to release them. Republicans voted to release them.

How is it the left that pushed this?

>>1516932
she was convicted under biden, in 2021

>>1516622
if epstein did it himself he'd be a literal super human.
If he trafficked to himself like the fbi initially claimed then he's clearly not doing a good job at stopping the population crisis

>>1517066
I don't remember Trump running on it
He ran on things like building the wall or draining the swamp. I don't remember him doing any campaign rallies where he said "vote for me and I'll release the Epstein files". Do you have any trump rallies or speeches where he talks about releasing the files?