Looks cool. So what is it?

>>28916591
Not they car i'd buy when ww3 is kicking off but at least it's a toyota.

congrats. looks dope

certainly not the worst choice in 2026, congrats.

>>28916591
Commiserations. Looks gay.

Lol faggot

Looks more like an FJ in this pic than others I've seen of it.
Beat the hell out of it and check back in 5 years from now to tell us how it went

>>28916591
you financed it

File: IMG_5449.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

>>28916656
It looks kinda chonky in this pic for some reason

>>28916667
51k down and they lose zero value so im chilling

>>28916650
>>28916620
>>28916597
>>28916598
>>28916612
>>28916617
Thanks!

>>28916591
>>28916591
FUCK YOU

>>28916745
>and they lose zero value so im chilling
Really?

File: 1787207-1054086341.jpg (467.4 KB)

467.4 KB JPG

>4cyl for $60k
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>28916591
Shit post aside, the redesigns look dated and old while being brand new.
Bravo Toyota.

>>28916745
>they lose zero value

Ya the older ones with V6s do.
The gen 4 Tacoma are already losing value hella fast for example.
Meanwhile older V6s models are holding on.

File: IMG_5472.jpg (197.5 KB)

197.5 KB JPG

>>28917047
>>28917146
Virtually zero value lost since 2024 models. Just compare used ones to current msrp

>>28917061
I will take inline anything over V6 any day. The hybrid is powerful, deal with it

>>28917146
>>28917160
23mpg with a hybrid I couldn't imagine the terrible MPG it would get with a v6 not to mention lack power off the line

>>28917165
Yeah could be better, but the hybrid is power focused, not mpg

>>28917160
the appeal of land cruisers is rugged durability, with a prissy hybrid system all that goes out the window
don't expect a car with suv with a hybrid system to retain value either, i've seen it all before

>>28917187
>prissy hybrid system

Kek
Ok boomer

>>28916591
Oof. Yikes.>>28916591

>>28916667
It would be very stupid to pay it in full considering the price.

>>28917227
prissy hybrid system

>>28917415
buying new is never a good idea, especially for hybrid junk

>>28916591
based, looks cool

>>28917415
Correct, it’s smarter to pay extra thousands of dollars for the same thing over the span of several years

>>28916591
These look cool, hate the factory wheels though. Still don't get the premium over a 4runner besides looks.

>>28917166
>thinks his turbo Prius is actually a performance car
Pathetic. I drove that power train in the crown and it was underwhelming. Couldn’t bring myself to buy a higher end Toyota without a V6 (or a V8 in the landcruiser’s case).

>>28917618
>I drove that power train in the crown and it was underwhelming.
Of course it's underwhelming. They're not performance cars. You know what else was really underwhelming? The 4.0 V6.

>>28917618
It has plenty of power in the low end which is what I care about since it isn’t a “performance” vehicle you moron

>>28917626
>>28917623
I’m sorry that you already have buyer’s remorse but the new hybrid 4 cylinders, as much as I love them in the new Camry, were never a good fit for their higher end cars. You think the resale value on the current ones is good? V8 land cruisers are practically savings bonds.

>>28917637
>V8 land cruisers are practically savings bonds
Maybe but I
1. Don't want to pay almost $100k for a used SUV
2. Don't want a full size 3 row SUV anyway
3. Think the 200 series is unforgivably ugly

File: 1773779496423217.png (685.8 KB)

685.8 KB PNG

>>28917160
>>28916591
>Fuck you I bought it
>Virtually zero value lost since 2024 models. Just compare used ones to current msrp
Look I'm happy for you, you got the cool middle class mom wagon. But you really need to be secure in your own discussions instead of seeking validation online. Prices dealers are listing online and what you could actually get for it are two different things. This is also a red flag that you're are trying to justify the car post purchase. Just be happy you have something nice to pick the kids up from school in, and stop seeking validation.

>>28917160
Check listings that actually sold.
You'll find that they're depreciating the same as every other car these days.

Also buying a car because you think it's not going to depreciate, is peak nigger retardation.

File: 1772217023661086.png (57.8 KB)

57.8 KB PNG

>>28916591
>land cruiser price for a slightly tweaked 4runner >goyoda's new Self Grenading™ 4cylinder
>techbloat off the charts
lol you have fun with that, you've either got more money than sense, or you're going to have a fun ten years paying that thing off

>>28917599
if you put 60k in stocks and finance the car, you end up with more money than buying the car outright. this is well understood

File: IMG_5477.png (375.9 KB)

375.9 KB PNG

>>28917717
>>28917710
>>28917637
These were the posts I expected, hence why I opened the thread with a premptive “fuck you”
Next month I’ll post my offroad photos with it when I take it innadesert so you guys can enjoy another thread, see you then! By the way, I negotiated under MSRP and it’ll be paid off in only a year or two.

>>28917714
Ok i will address your comment,
Obviously I don’t think it’s going to lose *zero* value I am exaggerating but compare it to a euro and obviously it’s holding value very well, it’s objectively true these cars are holding value above average depreciation

>>28916591
Is that the one with the V6 that blows up at <40k?

>>28917755
>paying 1100+ per month for the privilege of gambling on the future and paying far more interest over time

This whole board is full of absolute drooling retards. Fuck. No wonder all you retards can afford are shitboxes

>>28917764
No it's the one with the turbo 4 cylinder that blows up at <40k. It's also the one with serious transmission, transfer case and axle issues.

>>28917764
No they only offer i4 hybrid iforce max in the states, which I havent seen any negative reports on besides retarded bubbas like >>28917187 calling it “prissy” like it’s 2003

>>28917717
And then you have this retard who doesn’t even know which engines are the ones having problems. Kek

>>28917766
kek damn that's rough

File: oYNbWXF[1].png (411.1 KB)

411.1 KB PNG

>>28916591
They should build a pick up version of this. It would sell, even if they priced it at like $75K.

>>28916591
Should have waited for the V6 only xterra

>>28917761
>hence why I opened the thread with a premptive “fuck you”
should have opened it with a peremptive "i'm a retard," but then again you bought on of these hunks of shit, so i guess we don't need that
>Next month I’ll post my offroad photos
taking a stock $60000 car offroad is another dipshit nail in the retard coffin, unless you're going to mod it, which is 2 or 3 nails depending on how much money you spend. please record the inevitable call to your insurance agent when you fuck this thing up on a trail and try to claim it kek
>I negotiated under MSRP
i'm sure you got a great deal lol, you've made so many smart decisions already. was it actually under MSRP, or a couple grand off the dealer's sticker price and fees?

Enjoy the cruiser OP. They’re all just jealous because you can afford a nice suv and live in San Diego.

>>28917777
It would be over 100k bro. I have to imagine the shit economy and the gas prices have to be impacting truck sales, especially the full size segment.

File: 2020-Toyota-Landcruiser-LC79-1001x565p.jpg (187.3 KB)

187.3 KB JPG

>>28917777
it'd be 100 large easy. also, if toyota was open to another pickup design to sell in the US (which they 100% are not because it would take sales from Tacos and Tundras) they should just do a US compliant version of the 70 series.

File: 1776049650561813.jpg (29.3 KB)

29.3 KB JPG

>$60k plus tip for a 4 cylinder
>financed
>buying new

holy shit

every richfag finances their cars.
thats how you stay rich.
you only buy classic cars

>>28917809
Only muzzie terrorists can buy these in fleet

Really any car over 15k should be financed, even if it is 15,001. Spending money on a depreciating asset you intent to make depreciate more (by driving it) is a waste