>>4505216
Its basically the same quality as a smartphone. The long end of the zoom is very blurry and they break easily.

They’re really overpriced right now so you can sell it on ebay and buy a ricoh grIIIx

>>4505216
yea, don't listen to this poster >>4505220.
it's a fun camera, go use it.

>>4505216
looks like the inspector gadget of cameras, tbqh

>>4505250
Sell it before it breaks or enjoy samsung phone quarity. Your choice. There are many better small camera - simply not made by sony. Even an olympus omdem5iii is a huge upgrade. Because it won’t break.

There are a two inescapable facts in photography
Sony products are not well made
Sensor size is all that matters

Cope, if you must.

>>4505216
Assuming this is actually real because I don't know why any business would bin a $1.3k camera just because it has no box, yes it is a very good compact camera. It has image quality rivalling a Canon 7D which was a high end DSLR back in the day and can still produce great images today. It doesn't have the best lens of the RX100 series but if you're not trying to get photos of stuff miles away it's good, and if you do have to use it all the way zoomed in then it's better than just not getting the photo. Yes it's better than a phone. No it's not a fragile toy, my RX100 literally has a dent in the top and still works fine.