>his favorite camera doesn't even have low (high?) input-referred read noise (log2(electrons)) at 12800 ISO Yeah, that's why I always shoot with Olympus. I mean, Sony. One of those two.
>>4506440 Olympus only sells well in japan. They have a lot of fond memories about the brand apparently.
>>4506197 This isn’t a useful or meaningful chart for anything but astrophotography autism. Do you really believe an rx100 or g7x has less noisy pics than a pen f in normal use? Its like that retard that said an rx100 had the same IQ as a canon 7d. Totally stupid.
It also literally says the iphone uses forced noise reduction at all ISO settings so its values are useless.
And below that it tells you this chart doesnt and cant compare cameras.
>>4506455 >Do you really believe an rx100 or g7x has less noisy pics than a pen f in normal use? Its like that retard that said an rx100 had the same IQ as a canon 7d. Totally stupid. You really like to argue against facts when the evidence is right in front of your eyes in the form of a graph. Perhaps it's because you don't know how to read the graph, and neither does OP if he's trying to imply the phone is best, because higher is better and so the Pen F is best.
>>4506466 Every single manufacturer bakes their "RAWs" in some way, as dynamic range become the Holy Grail and all other aspects of image quality were thrown to trash.