Thread #20235528
File: q.jpg (19.4 KB)
19.4 KB JPG
Why does Tony feel the need to put on five and a half hour shows?
76 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>20235528
True, not enough B list celebrities and meme streamers for my liking. I need more ads and slop! WAITER!!!!!! TURN THE FUCKING CHANNEL TO WWE RIGHT FUCKING NOW! I NEED A TONEDEAF META ANGLE ABOUT TICKET SALES! DO IT RIGHT. FUCKING. NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>
>>20235603
>>20235627
Right, that's my point.
WWE putting on five and six hour shows would be equally retarded.
>>
>>20235656
Kek yeah thank god WWE never did that
Except for Wrestlemania last year on both nights.
Oh, and the one before that.
Oh, and the one before that.
And the one before that.
And before that.
And that.
And that.
And...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>20235627
Dynasty must have been shit if you are already coping like this. Crazy how celebrities in wrestling actually can make the show more interesting than have boring shitters have 30 min heatless matches in the same style for 5 hours straight.
>>
>>20235528
I'd unironically be A-okay with it if the shows went on earlier. In the UK these things are too fucking long and start at Midnight.
I liked that 3-4 PPV run where they were pre empted by the fed and the shows started at 7pm my time.
>Get the guys round
>Order a Chinese
>Have a couple of beers
>Shit talk all the funny shit
Was a fun time
>>
WWE putting on 4 hour shows with 4-5 matches is pretty cringe but Tony putting on 4-5 hour shows with 10 matches is still the wrong direction. 8 match cards with maybe 2 curtain jerkers has been tried and tested as the sweet spot
>>
>>
>>20237055
Anti-smarks love Pat. Id rather watch him do anthing than watch a bucks match or an ftr match or idk any of those boring shitters than wrestle the same match every time. Hell id rather watch Pat over Ospreay at this point too.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
You know how you know your shows are too long? When reviewers don't even watch them live because they are too long. At least two reviewers I know don't even have the show done yet.
I literally have to change my whole entire day around to watch these AEW PPV's. It's ridiculous. And you can't even skip the pre-show because they have title matches on it. I remember when they did All In Texas, I actually had to have lunch and then dinner WHILE THE SHOW WENT ON because it went like 7 hours.
I can 100% promise you that no one but the absolute most hardcore AEW fans watch these shows in full regularly.
>>
>>
>>20237046
>I'd unironically be A-okay with it if the shows went on earlier.
That's also the big problem. Not only do they go on long, but they start at 7PM on a Sunday. If they went long on a Saturday afternoon, it's less of a problem because most people don't have to get up early the next day for work/school.
>>
>>20237190
AEW needs to change how they book PPVs because it might make some fat ass smark post his Youtube review that gets 8 views a day later? And AEW makes their pre-shows actually worth watching?
You think these are valid complaints?
>>
>>20237228
>AEW needs to change how they book PPVs because it might make some fat ass smark post his Youtube review that gets 8 views a day later? And AEW makes their pre-shows actually worth watching?
People who get paid for watching these shows live opt out due to the length. That's a sign that something has gone wrong.
>>
>>
>>
>>20237276
Well, thanks for the laugh at least. I'm sure Youtube is going to mourn the loss of the two to three cents they will miss out on with "kbwrestlingreviews" being a day late with their fifty view vlog. Hopefully Tony Khan addresses this immediately.
>>
>>
>>
>>20237304
Unlike you I realize it's not worth my time to post shit no one is going to watch or read or give a flying fuck about to YouTube or livejournal or wherever the fuck else. I certainly don't cry and say it's AEW's problem and they need to change their entire PPV structure because I had to stay up too late creating zero engagement slop that will tragically be posted a day later now.
>>
>>20237321
Generally, reviews are worth the most closest to the event. People want to know what happened or see what others thought then move on. PPV's are always a big draw because they cost money to see and have a lot of big news coming out of them.
You can't always control how good a show is. But you can control how long it goes and what time it is on or when it airs. AEW could change times and drop some things from their show and probably get more viewers while doing less work and without upsetting their fans.
>>
>>20237418
>Generally, reviews are worth the most closest to the event
Why would AEW give a shit about how much a channel or blog that gets zero views is making off of said zero view reviews
>PPV's are always a big draw
Lol
>AEW could change times and drop some things from their show and probably get more viewers while doing less work and without upsetting their fans.
AEW will not get a single extra viewer because you and kbwrestlingreviews didn't have to stay up past your mommy-mandated bedtimes to make another horrible video
>>
>>20237448
>Why would AEW give a shit about how much a channel or blog that gets zero views is making off of said zero view reviews
People come to others sites to see how shows were and to make their decisions from there. It's also just good general advertising for the PPV's to have lots of people reviewing them.
You can ask people for specific numbers on how many viewers they get. I doubt you'll get an answer.
If the hardcores aren't even viewing your shows, you have a problem.
>>
>>20237490
Let's see how much traffic your blog is redirecting to AEW, or WWE, or any promotion really. My guess is it's nothing.
>If the hardcores aren't even viewing your shows, you have a problem.
This has literally never been a problem for AEW. What the fuck are you even talking about?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>20235627
Tony is served up beyond silver platters of opprtunities constantly to overtake WWE when they make huge mistakes and yet he refuses to and sticks to his bullshit and that's why we hate him and his clown show.
>>
>>20239157
Maybe I just like watching an entertaining show and what you find entertaining and I find entertaining are different. If you prefer gay gymnastics routines done by insecure men with no personalities that lead no where, that's fine. I rather see men with personalities talk shit and build up angles that I don't know what will what happen next. No one is right. Both can be valid. It's just opinions.
>>
>>
>>20239157
Im sorry i find different things entertaining than you do. If you find gay gymnastics routines done by insecure men with no personalities that lead no where entertaining, that's fine. I'd rather see interesting people talk shit and build angles where I'm not sure what's coming next. Both are valid. Both are just opinions. I feel bad for the people who feel the need to act superior about their taste in fake fighting shows. I feel like they hate Pat so much because he is holding up a mirror and showing them what they look like. Pat doesn't belong. Yea well neither do you but you think your opinion matters too.
>>
>>
Autists don't understand nuance or subjective enjoyment, they only know the literal. There are more matches, therefore the show is better
>>20237448
>Why would AEW give a shit about how much a channel or blog that gets zero views is making off of said zero view reviews
tony copyright striked a streamable clip that was posted on here exclusively one time so he clearly cares
>>
>>
>>
>>20235528
Because unemployed fat fucks like >>20247454 is his code audience
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>20252762
Well he (>>20252778) can't stand so he doesn't have a choice
>>
>>
>>