Do 4channers seriously believe this or are they joking? Look, women at large is most likely ostracising you because you act weird. 4channers do not socialise enough to be able to know this apparently.

In many dynamics, men do the pursuing and women do the selecting. This isn't groundbreaking stuff.

Chad is the only subgroup of human that actually qualifies as male. Everyone else are just subtypes of women. Gay subs are also hypergamous btw

>>84366802
It is like this, no one irl says it out loud

>>84366807
What are women selecting for? You will most certainly give the incorrect answer, but I am curious.

>>84366802
>women at large is most likely ostracising you because you act weird
lies.
women ostracize 90%+ of men. They can't all be acting weird. Occam's razor dictates that the problem is women, not men acting in whatever way.

>>84366829
women are selecting masculinity
it often comes with violence but the presence of power is more important than a few hits here and there
little timmy gets a pass because he is spiritually a woman

>>84366829
I'm saying that in many societal dynamics, women will get a bunch of men showing admiration to them and they have to be careful and aloof. They can't just choose everyone.
They have to discern the best choice for them, while men cast a wide net.
Thats why you get the "Men loving all women/women being choosey over men" phenomenon.
Its a system that works

>>84366776
>gay men: i love you
You clearly haven't dated men.
>lesbians: i love you
Lesbian relationships are the most unstable and violent by far. It's nowhere near as simple as you think.
Look, I'm glad I'm a bifag and found a comfortable boyfriend to live my life with and no longer have to deal with foids, but you're also wrong, OP.

>>84366840
I fear you only live online dear. Touch grass and talk to real people for a change. It should make you realise that youre beliefs are flat out wrong.
>>84366829
Its not like this. You dont know women irl and your only point of reference is tiktok and insta and reddit discourse

>>84366858
>Its a system that works
Except it doesn't anymore. It's 25 to 30 years of consistent and abject failure atp.

>>84366854
>women are selecting for guys who beat the shit out of them
At least you are honest

>>84366858
Ok. Just saying it is very greedy how women select for top percentile of men though. Everyone has noticed this and even dubbed it a new term called Hoeflation. Even the mid women think they deserve Chad.

>>84366859
My gay friend never told me any experience where someone lead him on for months of years only to brutally reject and embarrass him. Happens with women all the time though.

>>84366865
>touch grass
Normgroid slit your wrists cunt.

>>84366865
>It should make you realise that youre beliefs are flat out wrong.
I do live IRL, actually. You're just another cretin or a foid. Same difference, really.
Women, as a rule, are evil and misandrist. Basically all of them. And have been proving this consistently throughout my lifetime.
Of course women don't like it when men wake up to their bullshit, but that doesn't change reality.
Women's definition of "act weird" is ever shifting and always, without exception, self-serving. Men are slowly figuring that one out and tuning out (there's a reason 2/3 of young men are single btw). It's no longer "weird" when it's 2/3+ (aka a statistical norm). it is YOU who is wrong.

>>84366896
>My gay friend never told me any experience where someone lead him on for months of years only to brutally reject and embarrass him. Happens with women all the time though.
Sure, men are more direct. That's one of the upside of dating men.
But the physical standards are way crazier. You think women are picky on appearance? Try dating men lol.
Also gay relationships at first have a lower degree of loyalty. Yes, you get (way) more sex and physical affection, but also less loyalty (and some stds if you're unlucky and/or not careful).
Dating men is not easier than dating foids. It just comes with entirely different challenges. Things would improve if more bifags would stop repressing but, alas, that's a slow process.

File: 1654169754851.jpg (31.6 KB)

31.6 KB JPG

>>84366865
>talk to real people

This simp just wants you to get fucked, do you seriously think a robot with avpd will be able to be friends with women?
They will see you at best as creepy and disgusting and at worst as a potential rapist and if she accuses you of sexual harrassement you are fucked forever, everybody will believe her over the weird shy and quiet man.
Home is safety, don't believe evil simps.

>>84366916
>lower degree of loyalty
Not a problem. Better to not commit at all than commit and be betrayed. Women are fucking callous.

> gay men: I love cock
> straight men: I love chad
> lesbians: I love stacy
> steaight women: I love chad

Fixed it for ya

>>84366896
They don't specifically select for those that beat.
They select for those that have power and don't see beating as a serious enough downside

>>84366776
It's a simplification and a misrepresentation. Lesbians are also like that. Women are just like that. They seek constant drama and destruction. They abuse other women and men as much as they can. Mothers hate their children covertly, wives fuck with their husbands openly, female employees meddle with the coworkers, women in a free environment create hierarchies like chicken pecking order. Belittling men is one big power play they can always get just because men pursue them and care about their opinion. They can't get at men with much else.

>>84367082
>> straight men: I love chad
Why does this happen and how do I get something out of it as a chad?

>>84366802
Fpbp
If channers went outside they'd see the amount of mediocre men with gfs/wives.
Their loneliness is self-inflicted.

>>84367184
I go outside and basically never see this. On rare occasions I do its clearly because he is rich.

>>84367184
>mediocre men with gfs/wives.
they aren't fucking and he's funding their lifestyle

84366807
>women do the selecting
biggest lie ever told.

File: IMG_1682.jpg (27.5 KB)

27.5 KB JPG

>>84366776
So anon think about this.

Would you rather have sex with a kind and lovely woman who is obese and hairy OR
would you rather have sex with a sociopathic bully chick who is hot as fuck and holds you down and rides your cock aggressively and looks like pic?

You cannot rationalise or negotiate desire. Hot people are hot.

You have to remember how physically repulsive you are to women. Imagine fucking big bad smelling hairy obese woman. That is what you look like to women. You are the equivalent.

>>84367270
>Would you rather have sex with a kind and lovely woman who is obese and hairy
That sounds nice to me. I think the best possible romantic relationship for me would be one where we're on equal footing in terms of looks and personality.

can we force faggots back into their containment board?

File: 1776140048866922.jpg (498.4 KB)

498.4 KB JPG

>>84367270
But I'd prefer a bully chick more, just not sociopathic because I want to be exclusive. Not even with model looks. Are we men also weak to abusestacys?

File: IMG_1684.jpg (153.3 KB)

153.3 KB JPG

Ugly fat woman with short hair:
>ummm high anon I like thought you were cute and like maybe we could go get coffee sometime maybe so Im sorry so like

Super Hot Abuse Stacey in pic:
Hey incel loser. I want you to come back to my place and lick my cunt until I come whilst I call you a loser fag. Then I want to ride your cock repeatedly until it is red raw. Then you can rub my feet and lick my puss whilst I cyber bully that fat bitch there until she cuts herself. Come home with me now!

Which one would you choose?
It is basically the choice women have.

File: IMG_1685.jpg (54.2 KB)

54.2 KB JPG

>Hi anon. Cindy said your incel cock was really small and pathetic. Thing is, I like little loser boys because they are so fun to bully. I want you to lick every sweaty crevice in my crotch whilst I verbally abuse you and kick your pathetic balls.

>false equivalence troonster strikes again

File: 1774012124796975.jpg (25.8 KB)

25.8 KB JPG

>>84367270
>>84367337
>>84367351
Honestly both extremes are just not satisfactory to me. I'm a chad by low /r9k/ standards so I experienced women of similar qualities pursue me. Never with such caricature lines though. I find almost all women who I liked or liked me to be influential in forming my preference. I get a little chub reading those dominant propositions, but I also have absolutely no control over myself when I'm in presence of weirdo girls who make me speak softly and comfortingly to them like if they put a spell on me. Can we get more towards a 5/10 quiet pale femcel with a wolf cut black hair who's aggressive, pushy and bratty when you're like friends but gets flustered in love and sex?

>>84367270
>>84367337
>>84367351
You have correctly identified that there does not need to be a moral implication of women's standards. The blackpill is only a statement of fact, the following misogyny is irrational. However, you fail to consider that sub-5 females are simply not as subhuman to males as sub-5 males are to females. There is an important difference there which makes the comparison a bit unfair, ugly men face a unique problem that is denied by larger society, which ugly women do not face anywhere nearly as bad.

File: 1739155082639874.webm (3.9 MB)

3.9 MB WEBM

>>84367270
>>84367337
>>84367351
I will just settle for an average asian doll that will worship me, be a good mom, and have sex daily.