writing to IQ estimator

You should be able to tell intuitively how smart someone is after 1 minute of conversation

You should try and kill yourself. If you survive, you have over 130 IQ. Go ahead, try it.

Just eat their brain. Mensa brains taste more tangy. Like sucking on a battery.

>>16934894
This only works if the "You" has decently high intelligence and isn't bogged down by poor social skills.

I agree though. On social media, one or two replies in a thread is all that's needed to figure out if someone is a mindless golem or is thoughtful/has an active mind.

you can't tell this if you yourself are low iq, at least not without significant effort, but one way to do it is if you hate or dislike the person, if they stay rent free inside your head then they're probably more intelligent than you are, if you are within that range, it should be easy to tell

File: cat.jpg (74 KB)

74 KB JPG

>>16934894
Really smart people don't paint a target in their backs showing off their IQ. They just pretend to be lucky or blessed.

>>16935071
Being born a really smart person and raised in an environment that encourages and fosters it does come down to luck and blessings, though.

>>16934863
if he posts shit bait threads? dead giveaway, subzero IQ and addicted to sucking cocks too

>>16934863
See if they can derive energy from motion without looking it up while explaining what all the intermediate derivations are.

>>16934863
If you post on 4chan you definitely aren't.

>>16934863
if i get along with them without htinking they're an idiot

>>16935057
>if you hate or dislike the person, if they stay rent free inside your head then they're probably more intelligent than you are
retard alert

>>16934894
that doesnt explain what the intuition is

>>16934894
Not remotely true.
Very smart people often either struggle socially or purposefully distance themselves.
After 1 minute of talking to a very smart person you probably will be able to tell barely anything about them at all.
Meanwhile a very charismatic person will likely be good at faking outward intelligence in these short bursts giving people a much more favorable impression at first glance.
High quality deception itself takes a certain level of intelligence but certainly not a genius level.

>>16934863
They just have that look in their eye, or more specifically you can see it in how they look at things around them.

File: 1607795097717.png (164 KB)

164 KB PNG

>>16934863
see if they are they JQ cognizant

>>16935109
>luck and blessings
Tired of this leftist drivel.
>born high IQ
That's because of my superior genes
>raised in a good environment
Because my community is homogeneous and its members have superior genes.

Period.

>>16935475
yeah, that's not really true. their social skills are mostly dependent on the environment in which they were raised. a lot of people think that because no one likes them they must be smart. no, you're just not a likeable person, period. when i was doing my bachelors the smartest undergrad had actual social skills and was a pretty cool guy and the midwits who thought they were smart did not. and that was mainly because their parents spent their entire lives telling them they were smarter than everyone else so they were basically just sperg retards.

>>16935672
>Tired of this leftist drivel.
You chose your parents?

>That's because of my superior genes
You chose your genes?

>Because my community is homogeneous and its members have superior genes.
You chose your community?

>Period
You're on your period? You do sound like a bitch.

>>16934863
Administer the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale or an equivalent test.

File: 1748317615669555.png (24.5 KB)

24.5 KB PNG

>>16934863

They don't use the word "midwit".

calculate the integral of the composition (7-x)^(5e^2x) between 3pi and 7pi/4

if this is not hard enough, do it but for positive numbers only and transfer to polar coordinates

>>16936707
sorry, pi/3 not 3pi

3pi is way too easy since anything over 2pi doesn't need to exist in a calc equation

>>16936707
>>16936708
what if no one taught them mathematics?

>>16936709
Even a midwit can get a textbook and teach themselves. I know several people who can at least get halfway with this problem without any math education beyond trig.

>>16936724
What if they never had access to any textbooks?
>Even a midwit can get a textbook and teach themselves. I know several people who can at least get halfway with this problem without any math education beyond trig.
Well then it doesn't answers OP's question about IQ does it?

File: 61297.jpg (38.8 KB)

38.8 KB JPG

>>16936727
>What if they never had access to any textbooks?
myopenmath.com
alternatively pic related ships $50 from Amazon, less if you get an older edition
>Well then it doesn't answers OP's question about IQ does it?
It does because a person with at least 130 IQ will just buy the textbook, read it, do the problems and learn calculus as I suggested above.

>>16934865
Nah

You can ask them to take a matrix reasoning test and if they cheat and get 120+ then they’re <70 FSIQ

>>16934863
>hard mode: no midwit answers
btfo

>gym bros, if you can't bench 350 lbs you're a loser
>finance bros, if you don't make 300k a year you're a loser
>book bros, if you don't read 100 books a year you're a loser
>academic bros, if you're not 130 IQ you're a loser
>music bros, if you don't spend 5k on equipment you're a loser
>gun bros, if you don't have 10 accessories on your rifle you're a loser

What is this ubiquitous personality that plagues every enjoyable hobby or interest?

If you dont play vermintide 2 while high, you’re a loser.

>>16935109
>down to luck
I'm sorry anon. I think you might be a midwit.That's like thinking fishes are lucky to be born in the water.

>>16934863
>to check if someone is above 130 IQ /sci/?
They can provide clear explanations

>>16936729
Smart <> educated

>>16937224
>if you don't have 10 accessories on your rifle you're a loser
That's exactly the opposite of what gunbros say

>>16935672
>>16936558
B T F O

>>16934863
Look at iq world map average, tells a lot.

>>16935562
Chris Langan is a grifter.

>>16937505
how about
>if you don't ignore at least 10 gun safety rules you are a loser

>>16937505
There are plenty of people who buy tons of unnecessary and expensive shit and put it on their guns. It's called Tacticool.

>>16934894
Wouldn't restrict yourself minimally time-wise, but generally yea.

>t.

>>16937431
You are clearly below 130 IQ

>>16939002
Kindness, every super smart p.hd esc. person i have interacted whit have been wery understanding.

File: 14789888970452.jpg (33.7 KB)

33.7 KB JPG

>>16934863
Ask them what a "UFO" is. If they say anything remotely having to do with aliens, they're a fucking midwife. Correct answer is, "unexplained visual phenomena in the sky" or similar.

>>16941826
*midwit

>>16936707
I never learned how to do integrals, and am not particularly inclined to ever do so. I think I reinvented them at some point, and promptly forgot all about it. Knowledge is disposable.

>>16934894
I didn't even need one minute to judge you as below 110, since you said "smart" instead of "intelligent". And if you reply that the distinction doesn't matter I'll know you're below 105.

>>16934863
Ask them to become civil, orderly and organised. If they show any confusion, then you know they are regular human cattle and you can write them off as people the universe needs developing.

ask whether they believe in god

>>16942617
Get a log of this mummy's boy

>>16941035
this

>>16934863
>how would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning?
>how many 'r's are there in strawberry?

>>16937224
Severe autism combined with egomania.

>>16942735
>you can write them off as people the universe needs developing
that's actually a nice metaphor my dear fren

>>16935014
How do you know this?
>>16934863
Just ask them if they use AI. If they say 'yes', then you'll know they are most definitely under 130.

>>16944686
>How do you know this?
I eat people's brains. Desu.

>>16936558
>>16937526
Obvious same fag self fellating over being snarky

>>16934865
I scored a 121 FSIQ on the WAIS-IV, but from a sample of over 100 segments of my personal writing, WritingtoIQ estimates my IQ to be ~150. It's not very accurate in my opinion.

>>16934863
if they reply to threads like this

>>16936724
Then why are you still unable to actually answer the question? Not even smart enough to be a midwit, so all your claims should just be ignored?

>>16937431
No, its like saying that the fishes that are born in more social species in parts of the water with more resources are luckier than fish who do not have a helpful social network or as easy access to resources.

File: Screenshot_20260406_103935_Claude.jpg (706.5 KB)

706.5 KB JPG

Easy, I asked Claude

>>16947829
>HURR DURR MUH AI
kys

>>16947829
But claude literally just told you they are not qualified to make that measurement and you are too stupid to understand what it wrote.

>>16934863
questions drift and ricochet through the mind like wayward birds, arriving in jittery flocks—some sharp and insistent, some soft as dandelion fluff—each one carrying its own small ache or gleeful mischief, and each one demanding an answer that may be a neat, varnished thing or a half-stitched patchwork of guesses, memories, and borrowed phrases; answers, when they come, often stumble in wearing borrowed clothes from previous conversations, picking up the dust of assumptions and the scent of context, so that what feels like clarity is sometimes just a rearrangement of familiar pieces, and sometimes a new, startling arrangement that briefly shines before the next question tiptoes in and overturns the arrangement entirely, revealing new corners of ignorance to sweep, new curiosities to feed, new uncertainties to cradle like fragile glass—so that the whole enterprise becomes a kind of slow, noisy art: one question begets another like dominoes or like rings in water, and the answers circle outward, overlapping, colliding, contradicting, consoling, provoking, until the room is full of voices, colors, half-remembered facts and sudden certainties, and you realize that the point was never to end the conversation but to keep it moving, to trade the stillness of absolute knowing for the warm, unpredictable hum of asking and answering and asking again: "what about moose and squirrel?"

>>16947858
>questions drift and ricochet through the mind like wayward birds
Lol stopped reading. Sounds like executive dysfunction, or severe retardation.

>>16935014
T. Actual islander cannibal who sonehow logged into 4chan

>>16934863
Is there anything more pathetic than being obsessed with other people's perception of your own intelligence?
Every person posting about "midwits" everywhere and talking about IQ is clearly obsessed with being perceived as more intelligent than others.
Seems like a mix of narcissism, insecurity, and trying to make up for other self-perceived shortcomings.

File: 1775593524866r.gif (3.2 MB)

3.2 MB GIF

>>16947998
>my bio:
>I'm a mix of narcissism, insecurity, and trying to make up for other self-perceived shortcomings

>>16934863
120 checking in
I don't feel "smart", but it also feels like most people I talk to are retards

File: retard.png (23 KB)

23 KB PNG

>>16934865
damn I guess I'm a fucking retard then

>>16937224
being soulless
also some consumer cattle genes

>>16934863
>to check if someone is above 130 IQ /sci/?
ask them if they think they are smarter than everyone else.

>>16935071
correct. I'm also rich but everyone thinks I am poor.

>>16934863
>inb4 fake and gay
but I was in a program for kids who scored +3SD on the GATE test (regular GATE classes are +1-2SD depending on area and the upper percentile list of the test given).
Knowledge is not really a great metric, so meme answers like "solve an integral" or recite a fact. The students were actually pretty diverse (personality-wise) and I wouldn't say there is any personality tell either; some were conscientious striver types and others laid-back.I think the single trait that they shared was that you basically had no concern about miscommunication with them: I feel the average person tends to misunderstand things (including from each other) and I would say this basically didn't happen with these people. Even if they were unfamiliar with something, they could ask the right questions and identify what they didn't know. There was one high-functioning autist, who was somewhat of an exception to this due to social skills.

>>16954991
just write you believe tha man can get childs an climachange is real
and you get 160

all that iq estimation is bullshit
you need an old iq test before they had changed definition of iq

>>16934863
>What do you think about Daylight Saving Time? Why?
Their answer to the first question doesn't really matter but their answer to 'why?' is usually enough to judge their intelligence and several other personality attributes.

>>16956922
I got 138 on the mensa.no test

>>16957335
I like to get more sun in my day

File: accurate.png (68.4 KB)

68.4 KB PNG

>>16934865
literally first try

File: IMG_0079.jpg (514.4 KB)

514.4 KB JPG

>>16934865
I’m like 100IQ at best, I just know how to put words together in a precise and concise way because I, y’know, speak the language.

>>16947591
You’re a fraud

>>16934894
Heh, I deliberately act a little slow around new people because otherwise it gets a little too intense.

Folkman 113

>>16934863
Ask them why it's wrong to eat babies.
If they don't automatically go into philosophical debate mode and instead become emotional they are 110 tops.

>>16958718
Why not skip emotional and philosophical and go straight into practical

>>16957422
Fraud

>>16934863
Ask them how to solve a problem. Seeing people problem solve in action is a pretty decent gauge of their intelligence. Unless you're interviewing them for a job or something, not that much reason to want to know, like I don't care about how much someone can bench unless we're talking about it in casual conversation.

>>16937224
It reminds me of the question, who's the "greatest" scientist, or who's the goat basketball player

>>16937492
This is pretty good. Emphasis on "can". Not, they always want to.

>>16958726
me or the test?
to be completely honest I used a notepad for one task the one with colored dots in 3x3 matrices I didn't know I wasn't allowed to

>>16936724
>I know several people who can at least get halfway with this problem without any math education beyond trig.
what? how the fuck are they even suppose to solve this problem if they don't even know what an integral or derivative is

>>16941035
>>16943751
kindness is an indicator of 150+ IQ not 130+

>>16935071
I have met someone like that. We didn't fall for the sandbagging, it became clear that this was a brighter bulb than the average. Admittedly, it took a bit more than a minute. It was just all the small things such as never needing to ask for explanations, a tendency to quickly and correctly work out new things from basic principles, extending ideas in new directions, learning new languages in 2 months, picking up new skills way faster than the rest.

>>16934863
midwit OP, midwit question and midwit answers ITT
t. only non midwit answer ITT