How to project infinity without projecting infinity?

>>16957083
very carefully

>>16957111
test

File: 1570969608546 smart reaction.png (16.4 KB)

16.4 KB PNG

The final solution is adding a third dimension so that all areas, angles and distances are conserved.

If 2D projections aren't good enough then don't use them.

>>16957082
>>16957128
This. The globe was invented for a reason.

>>16957144
>broke
the earth is a globe, planes are just human simplifications
>woke
the earth is a plane, globes are a demiurge mystification
>bespoke
men invented spheres, god had to comply when crafting the earth

>>16957128
why add dimensions when you can remove them? you only need 1 dimension to draw the surface of the earth

Build a huge vise and flatten the Earth.

>>16957082
I've been working on this problem for 20 years (I am autistic but also dumb)
I switch between accepting that there is no perfect answer most of the time, and chasing wild geese down rabbit holes when I get what I imagine is very close to a manic episode
I've settled on icosahedrons. but I'm not happy about it

File: h3.jpg (91 KB)

91 KB JPG

>>16958931
While this doesn't solve your problem, you might be interested in reading up on Uber's H3 representation of the Earth.

>>16957082
What's the problem? Use a globe if you need to "understand."
Aviation and Naval charts already meet the needs for long distance travel. There's no unsolved problem, the professionals have adequate solutions.

>>16958931
the best projection is one that moves. Now you know, spend another 20 years on it kthnx