>>16958259
What's wrong with calling a bird a bird?

>>16958259
And they keep trying to give the T rex feathers, despite the fact that theres no evidence for it.

File: IMG_0729.jpg (34.4 KB)

34.4 KB JPG

>>16958266
Science has become one big giant woman.

>>16958259
im actually dinosaurs didn’t exist at all and it’s offensive to call them that.

they were indigenous lizards of color who were living undocumented on planet earth

>>16958259
Bitter lesbians and trannies come up with this shit to validate their poisoned worldview. We know dinosaurs roar because crocodilians roar. Birds would roar too if they were bigger.

>>16958266
>And they keep trying to give the T rex feathers
No they don't. Some dinosaur fanart a redditor made that got used in a popsci article online has nothing to do with what paleontologists believe.

>>16958259
They did the exact same noise as chickens

>>16958259
>sensationalist clickbait title
Which dinosaurs are speculated to have cooed? Does that include the one used for the article image? Journos have long since figured out that you can ragebait people who grew up with the Jurassic Park films by making articles like this.

Jurassic Park is a book/film so blatantly leftist that it takes a special kind of developmentally stunted, illiterate disney adult to simultaneously be that emotionally attached to it while having a raging hateboner for intellectualism and expertise. Getting your understanding of academia from headlines is just the cherry on top.

I wish this was bait, but this is just how normalfaggots are.

>>16958259
No scientist said this
>>16958266
No scientist is trying this

>>16958775
im a scientist and im saying this.

>>16958470
>Jurassic Park is a book/film so blatantly leftist
Its the exact opposite, and you are retarded. Michael Chriton's main theme in Jurrasic Park as well as his other books is that you should never "trust the experts", "trust the söyence" because the experts are corrupt, stupid frauds.

Go look up his 2003 CalTech speech "Aliens caused global warming". There is no Leftism without surrendering your personal autonomy to a central planning committee.

>>16958259
>Why does science seek to emasculate dinosaurs
Science doesn't do anything of the sort. When you see articles like this, it's always:
1.) Journalist does not understand what they were told/read.
2.) Journalist is deliberately fabricating an explanation or exaggerating a truth into a lie in order to get you to click the article.
3.) The "scientist" is a huckster who has happened onto strat-2 as a means to make a lot of money and get attention, ala Jack Horner.

>>16959156
It's less "don't trust the experts" more "companies are greedy and short-sighted and this combines with our modern godlike supertechnology poorly."

Which is true, btw. Sure, we don't have baby fit manchild John Hammond resurrecting frankenstein murder monsters to eat central American babies, but we do have retard Sam Altman disrupting the entire consumer electronics market and fucking up power grids for a glorified mechanical turk whose only actual use seems to be in aiding shitjeets to steal money and lonely people to masturbate