everything is simultaneously true and untrue at the same time, in superposition. if you collapse into one particle, inevitably the other particle may look- wrong/evil
if you choose any fixed state that is against entropy (entropy wants to return things to the neutral superposition).
So you will always have to to some extent defend a state against its opposite, so the destructive interference doesn't return you to neutrality.
there exists an alternate world where oil is genuinely made of ammonites and diplodoci and trees. it is no less real. just by researching you force your belief (bayesian) to manifest a particular observation. like "fine if you force me to choose here it is".
what am I saying?
that noone lied. it's just that the universe is inherently messy. and if you hold on to any one truth or value, which is fine to do, you will come into conflict with the opposite.

also does it matter?
say all science is false and all history too. so what?

what I'm saying is you are taking it very seriously

>>16958834
just wait till you find out what water is really made of

>>16958834
I’m sure a very very small amount of it is

>>16958882
>>>/x/

File: SOC-RushNoMore[1].jpg (446 KB)

446 KB JPG

>>16958834
>out oil isn't really made out of dinosaurs
Wait, wot?!

>>16958834
"Fossil fuel" is a Rockefeller education meme used to monopolize oil. Oil is probably a lot more abundant than we're told

>>16958834
Oil is kinda made of dinosaurs.

Wait until you realize literally no one knows why planes fly and bournoullis principle is something you can only understand in college after learning differential equations. Like why are they gas lighting us in second grade about superfluid flow?

>>16958882
>everything is simultaneously true and untrue at the same time,
Therefore your statement is untrue.

Nothing is true; everything is permitted. The election is in a cloud and not physical.

tets

>>16958834
The scientists keep lying about dinosaurs to make us look like fools. I'm starting to think they aren't even real now.

>>16958834
I got this insight by simply
>massive quantities lasting several decades of nothing but non plant organic matter all clumped up?
>I don't believe it
and I was right