You premise is flawed. There was no singularity at the beginning of the universe.

>>16959055
it's 50/50

>>16959081
yes there was
>>16959055
no space time began the moment the singularity executed, there was no time prior to that

>>16959081
Evidence?

>>16959143
The only singularities we know of in nature do not demonstrate this behavior of immediately executing. In fact, it is not yet rigorously proven that they change their state at all. What is the causal factor with the universe?

>>16959143
> yes there was
Why do you think that? Not even the Big Bang theory says there was a singularity - only that it was very small, but not infinitely so.

>>16959055
It doesn't collapse itself or it can't loop people and creation.

>>16959143
I thought it was an atomic particle that exploded

>>16959055
A causal loop is self-refuting concept. For all anyone knows, the universe could be following a cyclical process of death and rebirth. But even then, you still need an external cause to bootstrap the process, otherwise you're suggesting a process (albeit self-perpetuating) that exists without a cause, which effectively abandons causality, so you don't get to invoke causality in your terminology.