>>16960136
>Is this just a reflection of natural laws and natural selection, or is it a dysfunction of human society?
It can be two things. Natural selection operates within whatever environment a species is attempting to thrive in. The various societies people have created throughout the world are part of that environment. If a society ends up encouraging eusocial breeding patterns where a minority do most of the breeding while the rest are serving support roles to facilitate that breeding, then nature will select those that fit their roles to perform them.

>>16960136
This is retarded. Why would a 7/10 guy much less a 10/10 one sleep with a 1/10 woman?

there’s nothing natural about current selection. millennia ago if one alpha male hogged all the women the lesser betas would cave his skull in with a rock

>>16960152
Because women are the ones who make that decision, not men. If you're below an 8, it's practically impossible for you to have sex in the modern world.

>>16960136
>both science and humans have a reproduction problem.
pure coincidence

>>16960153
This
Sexual selection only matters for as long as the strongest most determined individuals let it
Rape just throws all the Bs out the window hence why women are the more attractive gender, we had full choice for Eons, and why women with no sex appeal don't exist