Thread #16960205
File: chesstism.jpg (256 KB)
256 KB JPG
>massive intellect
>chooses to spend their lives on moving pieces of wood around to outwit other mega-spergs
48 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: stop.liking.gif (242 KB)
242 KB GIF
> OP
>>
File: image_1776460499539.jpg (16.3 KB)
16.3 KB JPG
If we use the people with brain function IQ then the wheelchair people would have to be offset.
>>
>>
>>
>>16960205
you can't define intellect you can't test it in the way you define it
The thing you can define and test is the ability to predict outcomes, speed, accuracy etc... Which depends on the activity.
Someone who is good at physics or math does not mean they are good at studying philosophy or politics let alone talk to women
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1757875471171901.jpg (120.3 KB)
120.3 KB JPG
>>16960213
Why should he? He's had a great life being a chess player. There's also no guarantee he would succeed in academia as he did in chess. In fact, he probably wouldn't, because not many people really succeed in academia these days, even the smart ones. There is also no guarantee he would have the same passion and drive in academia. It's a totally different thing to chess, which is a head-to-head highly competitive 1v1 game. Academia is competitive but in a much more gay/soulless/bureaucratic way. His life appears to me to be far better and more fulfilling than nearly all academics.
>>
>>
>>
>>
The smartest, strongest problem solvers I've ever known have all been incredibly dogshit at chess. Better than the average player for sure, but gets smoked by anyone with an elo over 1300. Chess has nothing to do with critical thinking.
t. Physics professor with friends in math, neuroscience, biology, computer science, engineering and more
>>
>>16960512
this is such a stupid analogy, its like saying the smartest math nerd can't do biology, therefore they are not smart, that argument doesn't follow because math and biology have few overlaps compared to math and physics or math and computer science, it doesn't have anything to do with intelligence especially because the time spent solving math problems is time not spent memorizing thousands of chess positions
>>
>>
>>
>>16960516
>>16960512
midwit alert.
>>
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (74.1 KB)
74.1 KB JPG
>>16960205
>massive intellect
>>
>>16960205
>pursue a PhD slaving 5 years on minimum wage with little chance of a job down the line and then even if you do get a job you have to participate in the academic rat race begging for grants until a humble retirement
>intelligent
Pick one. Scientists are idiots.
>>
>>
>>16960544
>>16960561
Seething chess pajeets. Your shitty game has already been solved by computers.
>>
>>
>>
>>16960213
Sure.
A postdoc contract in the UK earns you as much as a burger flipper. And you need 2 - 4 postdoc contracts, each lasting 2 or 3 years before you have any realistic hope of tenure. So that is 5 - 10 years of poverty before you earn a smidgeon more.
t.Former postdoc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16960210
>>16960205
He actually has made a lot of money out of it
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16960205
>war is the mother of invention
>GM daniel dubov does gymnastics
>anyone good with war would kick your ass you stupid fucking inbred sperg get outbred, our ways are higher than yours, lets not forget kolmogrov and botvinnik soviet scientists who developed information theory contributing to modern chess.
>>
>>