>>16962583
I look at people's heads and judge them by what I see (proportions, angles, relative sizes). I've done this for decades and I'm usually correct in my assessment (prediction) of their character. I've been too lazy to find any old texts on phrenology but I suspect it may be worth looking into.

>>16962585
What exactly method do you use?

>>16962601
He's a racist autismo and you're retarded for entertaining him

>>16962640
>Tranny can't refute and resorts to ad hom

>>16963020
So, do you know the method?”

>>16962583
University of Oslo is as politically correct as tey get, yet they had an interesting obsession with phrenology. Parts of the collection was from illegally exhumed bodies of people executed after questionable legal proceedings, but that was not a problem for the university until it got out of control. Yet not everything has been returned.
Feed this into your favourite translator:
https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/xl/raseforskere-jaktet-pa-hodeskaller-_-na-vil-ingar-ha-hjem-tippoldemoren-1.15031837

>>16962583
>Someone once said that cranial vault height is proportional to IQ. What do you think?"

Inuit Eskimos have the largest cranial capacities on the planet and it amounts to 92-95 IQ. Larger than East Asians, larger than Northern Europeans, still lower IQ. To top it off they also have less societal and technological development than Mesoamerican and Amerindian neighbors in Central and South America (Aztecs, Mayans, Inncas) despite the later's cranium being smaller and IQs being mid 80s.

>Craniometry
Valid science. Brachy-meso-dolicocephalic skulls exist. The same applies to chamae-ortho-hypsicranic skulls. All these things are related to adaptation to environment i.e cold climate etc.

>>16964159
Could you tell me how the cranial vault height of East Asians compares to that of other race?

Someone making that claim was extremely hostile toward Chinese and Koreans and used cranial vault height as a basis to argue that they are inferior.

>>16964159
> 92-95 IQ
I thought it was 90-92. Have they seen any recent improvement?

>>16964159
>and it amounts to 92-95 IQ
that's actually pretty impressive

>>16964523
Yeah compared to the other chugs or nonwhites in general yeah absolutely. IIRC they have spatial reasoning abilities comparable to Whites.
>To top it off they also have less societal and technological development than Mesoamerican and Amerindian neighbors in Central and South America
They live in a frozen tundra.