File: kh-xehanort_feature.jpg (136.5 KB)

136.5 KB JPG

>>16963975
Speed of Dark is real.

Darkness>Light by 4%

Light may not be intrinsically tied to causality.

Incoming technologies and formulas that revolve around circumventing light's dominance in retrieval of information.

>>16963975
speed of light limit is just an assumption. It's never been tested

>>16963975
VERY anti semitic experiment
>>16964000
technically its an axiom einstein made

File: 1750139974081632.jpg (334.9 KB)

334.9 KB JPG

>>16963975
I only watched one of that guy's videos but it was annoying. I hate his clickbaity thumbnails and retarded facial expressions.

>creates substractive interference
>creates substractive interference again
>Guys! FTL!
Why are they like this?

>>16963975
Without watching the video, I guess they mixed up phase velocity and group velocity AGAIN

>>16963975
If this is the same thing I read a thing about the other day then the inevitable "no we didn't actually invent FTL" factor is that the "things" moving faster than light here contain no useful information.

Also off-topic but I think there was a comment on that article to the effect of "moving a laser pointer across the moon is faster than light but also contains no useful information so not really" which I know I've read more than once before and rank up there with "space is cold so stuff freezes" in the pantheon of midwit physics.

File: 1f.gif (340.3 KB)

340.3 KB GIF

The way I think of light is a bit like this GIF, magnetic and electric fields interacting with each other perpetually and self-propagating. So light being the so called speed of causality doesn't actually make that much sense because there are a lot of interactions happening. Meaning you have a lot of leeway to go faster but only if it's possible to cut down on the interactions happening per area.

I could see photons in wave packets move after free light from it had enveloped a pathway.

>>16964193
>Meaning you have a lot of leeway to go faster but only if it's possible to cut down on the interactions happening per area.
Prove it

>>16964000
>speed of light limit is just an assumption
Yes
>>16964000
>It's never been tested
Its been tested a lot.
>>16964149
yes, same as these wave packet exits cavity before it enters type of papers

>>16963975
There are none. We already knew that non-physical things like shadows, laser pointer dots or intersection points can move faster than light, because they don't carry information (and don't physically exist, for that matter).

>>16963975
am I getting this right: it's literally just confirmation that phase velocities can move FTL which we already fucking knew since forever? or is this something else?

>>16964897
laser pointer dots physically exist tho, and can carry information.

>>16965126
Whatever moves the laser dot carries the information

>>16965132
i'm just helping you think correctly. i think you should try again.

>>16964114
For me, it's the way he speaks.

File: 1770632015267769.png (76.6 KB)

76.6 KB PNG

>>16965126
Telling normies about physics was a mistake