Showing all 113 replies.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16988401
South Korea has plenty of access to birth control and everyone knows women lie about the frequency of their sexual encounters.
Historically, reliable birth control really hasn't been a thing. Going to guess access changed after the Iranian Revolution but someone would have to look up the details. Rome had some plant that was very effective but demand was so high that the plant went extinct. Probably too many other variables, plus lack of recorded data, from that situation to get a clear picture of what happened next but my guess is women didn't stop having sex.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16988338
You have to ban birth control and abortion, allow men to favor men in hiring and everywhere else and let whites have white communities again. None of that is likely to happen. The people who seek to wipe out whites are still firmly in control of issuing currency plus everything else. Speak truth wherever you can. The power to issue currency is the top of the pyramid. That is, the power from which all others are derieved.
>>
>>
>>
File: 5cbb382cc7a53196a402172da5c2fed32c2134ff.png (40.7 KB)
>>16988338
By waiting like 50 years. Human population follows literally a textbook example of logistic growth.
>We had no healthcare or modern agriculture prior to the industrial revolution so population growth is slow.
>Industrial revolution happens and population skyrockets in the past 100 years.
>Now circumstances are different from agrarian life so the population will stabilize at a healthier level.
Every other answer I've seen for this over complicates it and blames feminism or dating apps or financial issues or anything else. Humans are also apart of nature and can fit onto the studies we've done.
>>
>>
>>16988338
The single fundamental cause of declining birth rates is female access to education. The moment women go to middle school and realize there is more to life than being breeding cattle, they stop breeding. This is universal across all cultures, it happens in sub-Saharan Africa right now, their birth rates will drop to the EU levels in a couple of decades.
If you want muh birth rate, turn women into cattle. Simple as.
Except muh birth rate is a stupid meme. When Black Death killed half of Europe, the quality of life of the other half rose dramatically. Antiquity's slavery got replaced by medieval serfdom because peasants became too scarce to treat them like dirt. Supply and demand.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16988338
>All these replies blaming abortion and birth control
I thought this was supposed to be where the smartest posters hang out.
The issue is too burdensome to have children and people dont want to deal with that. So you have to unload some of the burden, that could take forms such as universal healthcare, or free quality schooling up to university, and since women will often chose to have not even a career (this words is used without understanding, most people dont have a career they have jobs) but financial independence over children, you have to make so they don't have to choose one or the other. And give people's homes, they won't have a family of their own if they still live with their parents when they are 30 and they also dont want their kids to stay until they are 30.
>But youre not entitled to any of that you want free shit
Ok then don't do any of that and let births keep decreasing.
>>
>>
>>
>>16988879
Agreed. Existence really is overrated. People who exist constantly complain about it. People who don't exist are much easier to deal with. I think it's been downhill since the evolution of the brain.
>>
>>
>>
>>16988338
you don't.
Only the ultra rich and ultra poor are having kids.
Infact we have much to do with expanding secular propaganda among the poorest and most retarded, the world doesn't need gorillion subhumans.
Industrial Automation will soon render human labour obsolete.
We are going towards a low population, low pollution sustainable future, few 100 million high IQ civilised humans will live and reproduce at a static replacement rate, Anti aging research will increase human life and youth.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16988338
There have been many attempts so far at raising the birth rates, but they've all pretty much been some form of "throwing money at the problem" approach. My proposal is instead the opposite: take money away from those who don't have children. Tax condoms, birth control, massively increase income tax for unmarried/childless women, and so on. Make it a financial liability to not have children.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16988338
I'd solve it like any regular people would, with a normal human style solution. Retractable hoses which forcefully extract genetic material from men and implant it into women, without the need for either to interact or say good morning. Have the hoses work like bees do for plants. Done.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16991656
Oh now we're complaining about human rights and shit. You could probably sell this as necessity. Without good genes humans won't survive. Withholding your genetic material is treason. Etc. The difficulty is the asymmetry in terms of resources and risk. Women bear the brunt. Men don't really need to contribute shit. This can't be really squared.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: عمالة-الأطفال-في-أفريقيا-2-1.jpg (183.4 KB)
>>16988607
They live in a low tech agrarian economy where having more children makes you richer, whereas we live in a high tech service economy where having children makes you poorer.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: SnoozeYouWin.jpg (64.1 KB)
>>16991690
>>16991703
Cubicle cattle don't breed and why would they? Who the fuck wants to have kids in a concrete jungle where they get to live cramped overpaying for a faggot shoebox apartment? Spending most of your days working in an insecure work environment doing the most bland soul crushing work imaginable doesn't exactly promote baby making behavior.
>>
>>16991707
Existence itself is overrated. We should just go extinct instead. Fuck everything. Nothing matters. We're going to die anyway. We're fighting entropy which must necessarily win because in this house we follow the laws of thermodynamics. Who cares if we exist for one more day or one more millennium. It's all the same in the end.
>>
>>16991707
Seriously you don't want kids? You will be an old lonely sore guy with no one in his life. Do you think your friends in the Internet are something? Politicians are your buddies? You must be a teenager or a very young adult
>>
>>16988338
free/cheap healthcare & cheap houses for poor and middle class people
no one wants to have kids because of how expensive life is and how uncertainty things are.
K-shaped economy only makes things worse.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16988607
No, because they are fed with cheap food that you subsidize with your taxes. Said food is grown using fertilizer made of non renewable hydrocarbons, they're synthetic, without them there would not be 8 billion people right now, carrying capathity of Earth cannot sustain it.
So yeah, it is expensive, but your paying for them, so it's dirt cheap for them.
>>
>>16991580
>Make it a financial liability to not have children.
Yeah but in a democracy why would there be public support for high tax rates for the childless when they become a majority (if they aren't already).
>>
>>
>>16992221
Exactly
The birth rate hysteria is pushed by banker jews and other rich faggots because the entire economy is a pyramid scheme, which needs constant increase of population so their money keeps going up.
>>
>>16992267
Fixes the birth rate. That was the task. You're bring up issues that weren't the task and are crying because the solution doesn't also fit things that were not part of the task. From now on, if you have additional requirements, state them up front or at least acknowledge your mistake in not including them in the problem statement. Insisting that everyone be able to read your mind is narcissistic.
>>
>>16992221
high IQ
>>16992385
higher IQ (close to mine)
>>
>>
>>16988338
Dysgenic breeding is the problem. Genetic hierarchy must be recognised and universal democracy rights abolished. This civilisation requires a cultural change that permits free market genetic engineering to evolve and mature as it is the only viable eugenic system.
>>
>>
Financial incentivism. Life is a ponzi scheme, let's be realistic. So, all humans must produce additional humans to decrease their tax rate. Every additional human up to 1.5 per individual drops your effective tax rate for life. Congratulations, the race is saved, and the cost is borne by those who refuse to cooperate.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1631960606624.jpg (799.4 KB)
>>16988338
>How
A salary sufficient to raise a family would go a long way.
Postdoc salaries in the UK is now on par with a burger flipper, just with a huge student loan to pay down. And women do not want that. I was credit checked and informed by drunken female colleagues during a company party that my financial standing was insufficient for the minimum requirement of any woman. They shared the information, and I am still single.
>>
>>
>>
>>
I hate to be that asshole but there's no coming back and Nietzsche was right. It's the parable of the madman. The people weren't ready then but he knew they would be someday and that day is today. We lost faith in the human project, all at once, across the globe, because we understand too much.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16988338
Waifubots and artificial wombs. Women have made it very clear they don't want children any more, and that reflects in the data showing that more educated and/or well-off a woman is, the less likely she is to have children.
>>
File: michal-kvac-early-evening-small.jpg (322.5 KB)
>>16992916
>But is their financial standing adequate for a refined gentleman like you?
My salary level was sufficient to pay down my student loans and invest and my degree let me move up. Back then my wealth was inadequate but patience did the trick so I could afford a stay at home wife.
>If not, why do they get to judge and you don't.
It takes two for this tango, you know. And I did judge some, like I didn't go for the severely drunken females and the mentally unstable ones.
>>16992931
Depends if you approve of the need for immediate gratification. Some of the women I met back then are still looking for that super rich and handsome guy. Most will never find him.
>>
>>16993454
Honestly, I can see why it's sort of off putting for women. No upside, many downside. Would you grow and shit out a human while the humans who don't have to do anything cheer you on? Humanity is basically reduced to being tiny human factories which can fail to build tiny humans thus rupturing the factory which also happens to be conscious of its demise. Honestly it doesn't sound like a good investment of time.
>>
>>16988406
Rome used ergotamine suspensions for that. Ergotamine is a derivitive of ergot, which is used in the synthesis of LSD. It's not a plant, it's a fungus that grows on rye, for the most part, but can grow on some other grains.
>>
>>
>>
>>
"Fix birthrates" of what? Eventually, birthrates rise by themselves as the population shrinks to a point where only the folks who tend to start families remain. That's true no matter what demographic we're talking about; white, black, brown, whatever.
>>
>>16991580
>My proposal is instead the opposite: take money away from those who don't have children.
That doesn't help anyone who cannot get married due to poor economy and/or job security. I was a postdoc where I had to change work every 2 years and preferrably move, even go abroad. And you need up to 4 postdoc contracts, each 2 - 3 years before you have any chance of getting tenure. Before tenure women will not touch you with a barge pole.
>>
>>
>>16995315
The tax would obviously apply only to women due to several reasons such as: there are more fertile-aged women than men, women statistically do not take on jobs that require them to be away from their family for extended periods of time (think oil rig jobs for instance), and women can easily find a partner if they wish (the same does not apply to most men)
>>
>>
encourage people to have 3 kids rather than the 2 thats usually portrayed in media and stop villanizing teenage pregnancies but start financially supporting them with free preschool instead since that's a good chunk of fertile years they arent doing anything productive in anyways
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16988392
imagine writing this unironically and thinking it was a good post
>>16988406
whenever this topic comes up on /pol/ anons say south korea doesn't have bc, but it's obvious they do. the tfr in seoul is 0.6, that's a quartering of the population every generation. it's worse than a world war every generation.
>>
>>16995152
if the population shrinks slowly it's probably not a big deal. but if you look at places like south korea and japan, it's a big problem. too many old people, not enough medical staff to help them, but older people still vote and control politics, so you get decisions that skew society in their favor. you see it across western countries too, local counties don't want to approve new building plans because it would cause house prices to go down thereby decreasing retiree wealth, public health officials overreact to diseases that disproportionately affect the old so you get covid levels of hysteria, and a shortage of medical stuff leads older people to vote for more immigration.
>>
>>16988338
By intensifying their negative growth rate and investing in robotic automation so as the ameliorate the top-heavy effects of the necessary and inverted population pyramid until such time as we can restore the human population to levels well below one billion and then maintain it there in perpetuity.
>>
>>
Young people are better prepared to have babies but cannot really afford it. Getting young people into housing, getting them to start families and letting them know that when they hit 40, they will be glad they had kids young rather than at 35. Older women aren't going to have kids and career women are opting out of them, plus radfems are psyoping women online and trying to destroy the nuclear family so they can practise polyamory and get resources from multiple men, It will be the youth we have to turn to, to reverse this situation.
>>
Criminalise extramarital sex again. This'll keep women from postponing marriage.
Then require women to be at least 36 if they wish to enter university or vocational schools. This'll stop them from postponing motherhood.
This is the minimum that is required if you actually want to solve it. Throwing money at the problem won't work and has never worked in the past.
>>
>>
>>16995912
JAJAJAJA wtf this is the exact reason why woman dont want fuck whit guys no moreee,the economy is bad okay?they know if they had a baby , they gonna still working during and after their pregnancy to support their families because their husband's salary is insufficient, and because women know there are jerks who want to prohibit them from going to university until they turn 36.