She realized that having a time machine would make her a god. But with the complete control over her reality, all questions answered before they are even asked, there is no joy in the existence. So in her manifesto she rejected the godhood and chose to remain in the shackles of our reality.

>>16991150
I would travel 10 million years into the future. Fuck it.

It's the sort of answer an enlightened person would give.

>>16991150
My son said he would go visit dinosaurs because they're rad, which goes to show that men > women.

>>16991150
this is very
>what is you didn't eat breakfast today
coded
she should be able to imagine a world if she traveled back or forward in time 1 or 2 days
I think most people could consider the implications of traveling back in time any amount and it's worrying to think of 'confusing' being why it's bad

>>16991150
Your daughter is an unadventurous incurious dumb bitch. says a lot about you op desu.

File: DSC_0332_crop.jpg (306.2 KB)

>>16991188
>unadventurous incurious dumb bitch
Here is your adventurous, perpetually-finding-herself, intelligent womyn.

>>16991186
It's AI slop

>>16991185
Your son is retarded. He'd starve to death. The air had significantly less oxygen back then, so you'd be out of breath just trying to walk around, let alone hunt, and all the plants were poisonous. No fruit yet. No veggies yet. Just a bunch of undigestible ferns.

you should reward her with sex

>>16991186
>what is you didn't eat breakfast today

Read it again genius.

What would it be like if you didn't eat breakfast today?
Retard answer: "What do you mean? I didn't eat breakfast today."
Normal answer: "I'd be hungry."

What would happen if I time traveled?
Retard answer: "What do you mean? I can't time travel."
Normal answer: "If I time traveled, I would not know what to expect."

Hypothetical answered. It's just that the answer was understanding there'd be confusion around what happened. You mistook that for an inability to handle hypotheticals. Possibly because you're... not that bright.

>>16991160
Same. Fuck the past and the present.

>>16991150
look like neither you nor your wife abused her, good job

>>16991225
Let's go one further and say fuck causality, why? Because what did it ever do for us? Make us possible? Who asked it why it gets to decide to make us exist just because we're a causually coherent branch of reality.

File: Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 13-38-15 230610130704-ted-kaczynski-restricted.jpg (JPEG Image 3000 × 2208 pixels) — Scaled (32%).png (809.8 KB)

>>16991150
Science fiction is for people desperate to science reality. She'll get it when she's older.

>>16991250
desperate to escape*

>>16991150
this isn't /sci/ and I reckon shows pretty clearly how bdaly botted this board is.

>>16991262
So badly botted you see posts complaining about bots and know 90% of them are written by bots as well.

>>16991264
You're a bot. He's a bot. We're all bots. Quick, what's 1+2. The answer is 3.0000000000145 right?

>>16991274
Ha, computers are such shit at maths.

They did a test with them asking for a math proof but added a single bit of irrelevent information and the results came back like 70% fucked, showing it never actually was "solving" anything and was merely predicting tokens.

The one that fascinates me is they trained a model on something scientific but also a bunch of info about dogs....and when it discussed maths with other AIs.....They Also Began Focusing On Dogs Without Speaking About It!

>>16991185
This post proves women are smarter

>>16991262
oddly enough it's better than 80% of the botted crap here

>>16991188
How fucked up do you have to be as a "person" to call a little girl a dumb bitch

>>16991223
how about you kys

>>16991283

To be honest, I blame the humans who designed them. Floating point fractions being considered "good enough" even though they clearly deviate from established reality is where it started to go wrong. Use strings internally, make it 100x slower, I don't care, just get the math right. Reeeeeeeee

>>16991224
Time travel is more than a hypothetical, it is a metaphysical impossibility, a logical absurdity.

Rejecting the premise as retarded is the only logical conclusion. Tell me what a four sided triangle would be like anon.

>>16991293
"real numbers" aren't real btw retard

File: 1779706432150596.jpg (90.0 KB)

>>16991150
>the way she structure the text
Dude your daughter is showing traits of sexual abuse/molestation. Take her to a gynecological check because if her hymen isnt gone yet it will show laterations.

>>16991150
She is fundamentally anti-Faustian.

>>16991290
Holy seethe. Kek!

>>16991408
>Time travel is more than a hypothetical, it is a metaphysical impossibility, a logical absurdity

It literally happens constantly. What are you talking about? Time moves forward, and time dilation causes things to age differently. Those are two examples of time travel. How is it impossible?

File: 1779765669614783.jpg (71.2 KB)

>>16991476
The past is that which once existed but no longer does. The future is that which can potentially exist, but does not yet. Attempting to travel through time is attempting to go somewhere that does not exist and is metaphysically impossible.

Moving forward in time is not time travel. Time travel implies moving from one time to another by skipping what happens in between.

File: metascience.png (532.9 KB)

>>16991480
>not posting the original

>>16991488
Why does the "original" use a different color text and a different font than the river? Why is the type not centered on the characters and instead offset? Why is there a white box blocking out where the black text would have been?

>>16991499
it's a metajoke. you wouldn't get it. maybe metaphysics can help you understand it

>>16991499
>newfag

>>16991480
>The past is that which once existed but no longer does.
>no longer does

You're sneaking the past-tense into your definition of the past.

>The future is that which can potentially exist, but does not yet. Attempting to travel through time is attempting to go somewhere that does not exist and is metaphysically impossible.

You just wrote that the future doesn't exist, and now you're stating that it's impossible to "go" somewhere that doesn't exist.

Going back in time would require matter to just reverse its state (energy, position, velocity, etc.). Of course, you would need even more energy to do this than exists in that matter.

File: Screenshot_20260531_174214_Chrome.jpg (101.0 KB)

>>16991552
>no longer does
Buy a dictionary. "Does" is a present tense verb.

>>16991552
>Going back in time would require matter to just reverse its state (energy, position, velocity, etc.).
NTA but the past is under-determined given the present and in any case cannot possibly involve anyone "going" to it by such means because every observer would be reverted as well so there is no possible perspective inside the universe from which time would be actually moving backwards.

OK, let's explain why you can't meaningfully go into the past: You're part of an existing casual chain. You can't change your past, any more than you can lift yourself by your bootstraps. It's physically impossible because if you had a different causal history you would be a different person in a different timeline.

File: 83c6a3ba866f847e58bac5feb6c246b7.jpg (30.9 KB)

>>16991676
But I saw it in da mooooovies!!!

>>16991676
Time travel doesn't care about your casual logic

Time flows in one direction, it's not inconceivable that this flow could be reversed. Maybe it's impossible, maybe it's not, but again, this is not contingent on you thinking it would just be too weird.

>>16991637
As in "no-longer." Why are you trying to evade?

File: bb-m09.jpg (135.8 KB)

>>16991221
The Jurassic Period (~201 to 145 million years ago) had more oxygen.

>>16991764
You could go fish in the ocean for food, just as long as you don't pull up us.

>>16991150
And what does this have to do with science? Go post it on plebbit, no one gives a shit about what your daughter has say on time machines.

Traveling backwards, they couldn't be part of space/time only time. So space would have to be removed from the body. You could do within you mind with quantum jump or electromagnetism through the veins..

File: Screenshot_20260531_223644_Chrome.jpg (276.1 KB)

>>16991745
Longer is an adverb and has no tense. You have failed yet again.

File: RdNN0LC.gif (1.3 MB)

>>16991789
>You could do within you mind with quantum jump

>>16991150
I'm time traveling to 1946, getting absolutely loaded rich off the stock market and enjoying the most soulful era of my country where I still have access to most modern conveniences.

>>16991221
I can live off stegosaurus chops, which are probably delicious.

>>16991221
>He'd starve to death. The air had significantly less oxygen back then

Yes, because we eat oxygen and he couldn't take some McDonald's with him.

>>16991292
>triggered

>>16991790
No, shit. I wasn't referring to grammar, and you know that, but you're obviously just evading.

>>16991150
Today is a gift. That is why we call it The Present.

>>16991150
Is she hot?

>>16991150
adorable for sure

>>16991829
As a third party it's more obvious to me that you're retarded.

File: MV5BM2JmMzNiNDItZGQ1Ni00NjE1LTllZDEtZmRiNjIzYzdhZDVmXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg (137.5 KB)

>>16991797
I was at work with a small window. I'll use the AI punctuation next time. damn it..

One recent story was I was exploring stars as "liquid metal" with Lattice Structure Theory with Pierre-Marie Robitaille.
I had a large quantum jump in the 1800's in France through an esteemed man's life. Got to see all the sights!
Pierre-Marie Robitaille has a strong family of scientists. The mind with a strong time connection through family lineage plays a role in people.

>>16991676
>>16991732
>>16991678
all wrong, think of time like a river:
It flows in one direction and everything behind it is the pas and everythuing...in front of it is the future. so you just need to craft an boat like noah's ark- oh wait I'm god we can use Noah;s akr its fucking time travel woooo

>>16991897
Could you explain how including "no longer does." In your definition of the past isn't invoking the past (circular)?

>>16992494
"That which once existed but no longer exists" defines something and there's nothing circular about it. It's not up for debate. Now, I don't think it actually defines "the past", but if you actually read his post he wasn't even trying to. He was saying the world in its past state doesn't exist now.

>>16991221
>The air had significantly less oxygen back then
only at the beginning, 200+ million years ago, and significant is an exaggeration, it would be like going to an elevation of about 3500 m today. sure, there'd be shortness of breath and feelings of tiredness for a few weeks at most, but that's not an issue when you can't even find drinking water not watched by some predator.

>>16992339
No need. Your body is atime travel device crafted by the loving third hand of Jesus himself. It travels through time at speed=1.000. God is grate. The grate of existence which only admits the finer things, and filters out detritus like you.

>>16992502
>The past is that which once existed but no longer does.
>not a definition of the past
Sure.

>>16992798
But.. he's right. That's not a definition of the past. That's a definition of what once existed but no longer does. It doesn't mean it was our past light cone. A more correct definition of the past would be something like: the causal chain leading to a given state. Anything not in the chain is not in the past of that moment. Events outside your light cone have no bearing on your current state, therefore they're not in the past until they can causally affect you.

File: not-the-past.png (17.3 KB)

>>16992798
How are you getting filtered by this yellow area being defined?

>>16991765
imagine eating jurassic fish and every time whole clades get erased from existence

>>16991802
>I'm time traveling to 1946
could you plz abort baby trump while you're there?

>>16992815
how the fuck do you define 'things that don't exist'?

File: brainlet.jpg (49.1 KB)

>how the fuck do you define 'things that don't exist'?
How the fuck do mouth-breathing retards who can't even form coherent thoughts think they're intelligent?

>>16993174
they're uniquely the delusions of man. fairy tales involving fairies, unicorns, deities, and more. granted that would be the white area outside the two spheres. things that once existed but do not currently would be extinct species, one's virginity and so on

>>16993182
>they're uniquely the delusions of man.
That doesn't define anything, that tries to characterize the defined category.

>fairy tales involving fairies, unicorns, deities, and more.
That doesn't define anything, either. That only provides examples from the defined category.

You niggers actually don't understand what a definition is.

>>16993187
>Defining the category isn't defining the category
Lol.

>>16993190
You haven't defined the category. "Things that don't exist" defines the category. Your mouth-breathing friend was essentially asking "how do you define the definition of what you've defined?" and you responded by shitting out whatever free associations you had with the category.

>>16992815
>all the things that ever existed
>existed
>ed
Sneaking the past into your definition of the past again.

If you redefined the red circle to be "everything that exists or existed," then that would also be circular.

>>16991150
She will grow up to marry and divorce a man for his resources like every other girl.

>>16991160
enjoy death by random flu

>>16993467
>Sneaking the past into your definition of the past
You're a mentally ill retard so you can't grasp this isn't a definition of the past even when it's spelled out for you in multiple ways that it isn't a definition of the past and evidently wasn't supposed to be one.

>>16993755
as opposed to a mentally ill person who is not retarded?
[unnecessary pejorative adjective] [pejorative]
brevity is the sovl of vit. while you may think appending such redundant descriptors makes you come off as more intelligent, it's actually the opposite. your argumentative technique is self-refuting.

>>16993760
>as opposed to a mentally ill person who is not retarded?
Yes. As opposed to that. You could be either or none, but you are both simultaneously.

>>16993768
as opposed to both asynchronously? lol. we need to post a picture of you under the definition of dunning kruger.

>>16993771
>80 IQ psychotic patient continues mumbling incoherently

>>16993788
i accept your concession.

>>16993792
I accept that you're having a mental episode.

>>16993798
Me: i accept your concession
(You): I accept
we're done here. gg no re

I won't name names, but there's a mentally ill retard ITT. He knows who he is and will confirm this soon.

>>16991150
OP's daughter is a better human than most of you vermin. Listen and learn.