File: IMG_3347.jpg (536.2 KB)
Of course there’s an absolute time. Just because the tick rate is constant and non-discreet doesn’t mean there’s no world clock. Relative speeds are all relative to the absolute time constant in the global frame.
Showing all 14 replies.
>>
>>
>>
Energy dispertion solves this, no?
Also are they just saying average time no gravitational time dialation?
Or that time passes at different rates but still ticks?
Then riddle me this how to two divergent asyncronous temporal phases ever intersect? Time is just dialeted or time or energy gravitationally constraint and yes everything is relative.
>>
File: 1695022453625969.jpg (648.4 KB)
>>16991470
whats the time then now nigga
>>
>>
File: bttf2_3478174a.jpg (26.4 KB)
>>16992266
1.21 gigawatts? Great Scott!
>>
>>
>>
File: r35z.png (156.5 KB)
>>16994829
see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_time
>>
>>
>>16994843
See
>>>16994846
Where i said:
Wrong. CMB dipol is a more then zero evidence that we are in motion to an absolute reference frame. Why else would it be almost perfect, but with a dipol from relative speed of 370 km/s? Simplest conclusion is in the reference frame its extremely homogenous, and in motion we see the doppler effect.
>>
>>
>>
>>16994849
My criticism is 100% scientific. If CMB was known 1905 Einstein would not have gotten away with relativity.
What about my argument is "unscientific" according to you? Lets go through.
>Why else would it be almost perfect, but with a dipol from relative speed of 370 km/s?
This is a fact
>Simplest conclusion is in the reference frame its extremely homogenous, and in motion we see the doppler effect.
This is actually not a "simple conclusion", its the only real conclusion
>CMB dipol is a more then zero evidence that we are in motion to an absolute reference frame.
And this follows, since we hvae some physical effect that is homogenous in this reference frame only.