Don't reproduce.

File: HJ1qW-dXMAA94tf.jpg (89.5 KB)

>>16993433
If a monkey steals a banana and a human takes it back, the monkey reacts aggressively.

Martin Nowak, the Harvard söyentist. That's the kind of person who tells you what you're allowed to think. The monkey fuhrer.

>>16993444
If a monkey fucks a saxophone, does the musician react by using a different instrument?

Man, the conxept that some things can have mass without interacting with other fields is truly mind melting to low-IQs.

They've turned science into a Monty Python show.

That they need this kind of trick is embarrassing enough, that they say most matter isn't even visible is parody. Just say you have no idea what's going on.

>New Map of Local Dark Matter Reveals ‘Bridges’ between Galaxies
>Additionally, it identified several new structures that require further investigation, including smaller filamentary structures that connect galaxies.
>“And we can study these filamentary structures directly, these hidden bridges between galaxies.”
https://www.sci.news/astronomy/local-dark-matter-09695.html
In other words, they monitored a Birkeland current. Perhaps a universe that consists of 99.999% plasma and is permeated by magnetic fields (as they were forced to admit) should also be modeled as plasma.

>>16993605
Produce some

>>16993373
i can do the same thing with quant analysis only this is dealing with ensembles and shieet

>>16993373
>things that never happened, the thread
amazin'

File: image_2026-06-05_134807771.png (1.7 MB)

>>16993373
Oh god dammit fine, i'll explain it again. Here is the cosmic egg. This is what our universe looks like. We exist in the observable universe, where chaos has collapsed into a stable system. The "static" region outside the egg is Dark Matter. It is incoherent matter - pendulums which exist, but have not stabilized into a coherent SYMMETRCIAL system - i.e. observable matter. We can also observe, through Chaos, what I believe to be the emergence of Duality and Symmetry

Physics is the study of Symmetry, after all

>>16994731
I suppose i'm compelled to elaborate. Nucleons are always bound with 3 quarks, and what we are seeing here is a 3 body chaotic pendulum represented as an analogue of the Nucleon 3 body problem with every possible staring position, roughly approximating what a quark soup would do.

Perhaps there was no slight asymmetry during the big bang?

>>16994734
Can somebody please respond and tell me how retarded I am?
Some thoughts:
This image does not explain the origin of gravity
*IS* Nucleotide quark composition a 3 body problem?
Yes

Intrinsic angular momentum correlates to a magnetic moment
The interaction is clear: E=MC^2
Spinning energy creates an attraction to mass proportionate to it energy constituents
Gravity exists because *non tangible* things spin, creating energy analogues to a spinning mass, however the mass does not exist.
>If energy spins, it attracts energy towards it. This is gravity. Energy always spins, unless it's energy is 0
>Mass constituents must spin to create gravity
>Every action has an equal to and opposite reaction
>If you cool mass to absolute 0, it stops spinning and will possess 0 mass
>This is as difficult as accelerating the smallest increment of mass to C

>>16993433
nowadays civilized people dont reproduce by default

>>16994731
>let me tell you about a random structure self sustaining on randomness

Dark is a type of hydro.

>>16994731
is that what you see on your LCD trips?