//sci/
File: method.png (214.2 KB)
214.2 KB
Is it me or is this paper retarded? It claims that cold-water-extraction of codeine from paracetamol doesn't work because when they tried, 60% of the paracetamol remained in the filtered solution.

However according to the paper they dissolved essentially 4g of paracetamol in 250ml of water at 4 degrees celsius. Another paper said paracetamol has 8mg/ml solubility in 5 degree water so that 250ml should dissolve about 2 g paracetamol. This would explain why they were still left with just over half the paracetamol in solution

So it didn't work because they used too much water. But this seems obvious, I don't see how the University of Australia could have made such a mistake. Am I missing something here?
Showing all 7 replies.
>>
File: tablets.png (156.5 KB)
156.5 KB
>>
File: results.png (160.9 KB)
160.9 KB
>>
File: title.png (368.3 KB)
368.3 KB
I am going to assume this paper is retarded and my lean is good and not going to kill me. Used 100% real grape juice as well.
>>
Someone please help because I'm scared to CWE higher doses of codeine in case the paper is right.
>>
>>16993404
>"ACCURATELY weighed amounts of APPROXIMATELY 1.6 g ibuprofen lysinate"
>>
>>16993404
the study is about ibuprofen, which is distinct from paracetamol, so there's a enough retardation for everyone
>>
>>16993404
I once tried cold water extraction for codeine and the resulting liquid was the most bitter shit I had ever tasted, maybe got a minuscule buzz, in the end not worth the time and effort, just go buy some cool drugs that actually do something

Reply to Thread #16993404


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)