i had never heard of this "nano-hydroxyetcetc" toothpaste but a cursory google search makes it sound legit. can the /sci/entists here confirm or deny that i should switch?
>>16994117 >>16994125 Bunch of 'tards in this thread. If you've ever seen this meme, the low iq and high iq ppl are generally correct or aligned while the normie ends up being the midwit who's wrong.
Depends who you listen to. Some say fluoride is great for teeth, and Americans generally have good teeth but it's a chemical and some scientists think it fucks with your brain.
>>16994097 To absorb the lead in the water... You know thats why put it in the water right? To absorb heavy metals because its better to say the water has fluoride in it instead of telling people but the water still passes through lead pipes in certain areas.
>>16995078 Reality doesn't give a shit who you listen to. Fluorine is a highly reactive element. At large doses, it is absolutely toxic and will fuck your shit up. It also bonds strongly to the calcium in your bones, forming a material that is more resistant to chemical erosion (like cavities).
The goal is to introduce this element at low enough doses to not be toxic but sufficient to provide benefits.