>>16995020
V-tol aircraft are obsolete since their primary missions can be carried out better by drones. Proper bombers can't rise vertically and proper fighters beat out anything that rises vertically. These had a niche in sort of low impact low scale missions but drones just do those better and cheaper. There's no real reason to develop these aircraft any further until you can at the very least ditch the pilot.
Also those do not have "propellers" if you mean bending the exhaust then yes that's the best way to get something super heavy like this up in the air while also maintaining the ability to fly fast.

File: 1578567321844.png (261.7 KB)

>>16995126
>V-tol aircraft are obsolete since their primary missions can be carried out better by drones.
>last mission in Iran used the Osprey
>modern dominating jet fighter is a v-tol
I'd say good start, didn't bother reading past that, all in all 10/10 in being wrong and a retard