Thread #154237064
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
>What
A general dedicated to the discussion of springtime-ish gridiron football leagues

>Who
UFL(U.S), CFL(CAN), X-League(JPN), EFA(EU), LFA (MEX) and various other leagues that fluctuate in being alive

>TQ
How many different QBs will start for my Gamblers this season?

previous: >>154096643
+Showing all 22 replies.
>>
>>154237064
>How many different QBs will start for my Gamblers this season?
Guessing just the 4.
>>
UFL Week 4
>Thursday 4/16
Louisville Kings (0-3) @ Houston Gamblers (1-2) 8:00 EDT on NFL Network
>Friday 4/17
Dallas Renegades (3-0) @ Columbus Aviators (0-3) 8:00 EDT on FOX
>Saturday 4/18
St. Louis Battlehawks (3-0) @ DC Defenders (2-1) 12:30 EDT on ABC
Orlando Storm (3-0) @ Birmingham Stallions (1-2) 4:00 EDT on FOX
>>
>>154237064
UFL and LFA games
>>
>>154237891
Oh man we're eating good on Saturday.
>>
>>154237900
Only one of the LFA games Will be in TV, i havent found anyone streaming the Disney+ games yet
>>
/UFL/ + /SF/ will never die
>>
>>
>>154238146
das rite
>>
>>154237900
yezzir
>>
>>154237064
Kangz finna dab on that gamblets
>>
File: gades.png (6 KB)
6 KB
6 KB PNG
My 'gades :)
>>
They updated the OT rule on defensive penalties. Subsequent defensive fouls don't result in an automatic good try anymore, it escalates to half the previous distance. So instead of the 1, it goes to the 1/2. Then 1/4. Etc. No change to the offensive side, if you commit a foul on offense it will result in a loss of down, period. I'm sure nobody will scream about this in the future.
>>
>>154242966
an improvement, people will always scream.
>>
>>154242966
But any what point does it get ridiculous? Are we really going to do "Ball on the 1/128"?
>>
>>154243014
I will scream because I think the original rule didn't need much tweaking.
>>154243018
Honestly it gets ridiculous after the 1/2 yard mark. Should have just changed it to "If 2 consecutive defensive penalties, automatic good try." I think everyone would be fine with that.
>>
>>154243325
That's what it was.
>>
>>154243352
No it wasn't, it was "2 penalties in the OT period". What I'm saying is the holding called on Louisville that ended the game should have moved to the 1 yard line, despite the fact that they had a penalty on an earlier try, and THEN if they commit another penalty the try is good. Also have the refs announce after the first penalty "You do this shit again and they're getting the points".
>>
>>154243425
This makes more sense. Knee jerk change was not the move
>>
>>154245423
3 bongs until 80k people watch Houston get their ass ripped open on the NFL Network
>>
>>154245744
Didn't mean to respond but whatever. Fuck it we ball.
>>
I'm ready for some Thursday Night Football, even though I am back on the wagon. Gonna eat some carnitas and relax.
>>
my gamblers bout to piss everybody off in 2 hours

Reply to Thread #154237064


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)