Thread #154330879
File: 1776892740080661.png (517.5 KB)
517.5 KB PNG
Make it make sense
28 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
File: burnley goal disallowed for no reason.jpg (63.9 KB)
63.9 KB JPG
No.
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_3198.jpg (229.2 KB)
229.2 KB JPG
makes perfect sense
>>
>>
>>
>if you overlap with the defender you are still onside
I believe this would solve everything, it would be then humanly possible for the striker to stay in the line with defender without making millimeter mistakes
and if he is so much forward he doesn't overlap anymore, even for a millimeter, he really has no one else to blame but himself
>>
>>
>>
>>154338198
It’s feet in both rugby codes. The only thing I can think of why they’d use shoulders or anything not feet is because of diving headers but I don’t see that as a good enough reason for it being more difficult to judge
>>
>>
>>
File: BALLS OF STEEL.jpg (31.1 KB)
31.1 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>154338198
It should be clear as daylight. A few seasons of fans seething is a bonus.
Nostalgiafags should cry more about the 1990 rule change that allowed attackers to be level with the last defender. Either completely behind or in front.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1720265965736515.jpg (281.5 KB)
281.5 KB JPG
>>154330879
>tp
>tf
>>
>>
File: IMG_0006.jpg (209.9 KB)
209.9 KB JPG
What’s crazy that all of these happened with the same VAR ref, such a coincidence
>>
>>
>>
>>154349763
>Or is it more prolific?
It isn’t, the semiautomatic system has been wrong in this same way the same amount of times against Barcelona (4 in 30 or so matches) as it has for all other LaLiga teams combined (4 in 600+ matches)
>>
>>
>>154330879
forwards used to have to be behind the last defender. They brought in lot's of shit to help more goals to be scored including being level, not interfering with play etc. forwards even have the advantage of knowing where the last defender is when making a run and the one passing to them does as well. So frankly they get more than enough, fags crying about it want goal hangers like Lineker scoring 50 goals a season.